IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

    Showing 1184

    Filtering text fields in "custom attributes" is extended

    Filtering is truncated in text fields in "custom attributes" which is a design limitation related to customer attributes: when a string attribute value exceeds 449 characters, it is not supported. Reference : Known Issue: DT089073 Case: TS02143988...
    26 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    ERM : Deleting attributes / Enabling multiple selection

    This proposal aims to "simplify" the daily life of the ERM administrator In the "Artifact Types" tab, to remove multiple attributes attached to an "Artifact Type," simply: 1/ Make a multiple selection, 2/ Click "Remove Artifact," 3/ Confirm with "...
    3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Ability to remove Enumerated List Item definitions without need for removal of value from Attribute against individual Artifacts

    We've need to remove several Items from within Attribute Data Type Enumerated Lists of Items (Enum), within the Type System. We've recently discovered, if the Item so removed were applied as an Attribute value to an Artifact Object when the Item w...
    17 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

    Provide RM publish queue clear button in debug page or somewhere else

    -There is no option in DNG to stop reports that are being generated. -There is also no option to empty the reports queue When long reports are running, the immediate important reports are getting and blocked. Many users are also reporting that the...
    27 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

    Automatic filtering with new criteria independent of collapsed or expanded mode

    When using collapsed filter, a newly added filter criteria is immediately applied and the content is filtered. When using expanded mode, a user has to always click the additional "apply" button. Please enhance the behavior in expanded mode to redu...
    about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    attributes on local components and configurations

    introduce attributes on local component and configuration level (at least RM & QM) similar to GC - it should be possible to define if the attribute is allowed to be changed for a BL - it should be possible to set permissions which role is allo...
    about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Future consideration

    Baselines in the past - integration with audit history

    Creation of a baseline in the past is a great feature. But to use it a user has to know date and time. And the way to get date and time for the retrospective baseline creation is pretty often via review the Audit History. The proposal is to integr...
    11 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    Keep Filters when importing Views using ReqIF

    When exchanging views, filters in these views are dropped. It costs a lot of time to add all these filters again.
    about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

    LQE needs support for the Out of the Box Tag Attribute provided by IBM

    the entire purpose of a data structure within a data base is to enable easier/swifter access to the data within for extraction via reporting, or statistical aggregation and analytics. An attribute which cannot be reported upon is contra to this ba...
    over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 5 Future consideration

    Add participants to review - option to select a team

    In DOORS Next, create a team and add users. When adding participants to review, we cannot select a team. Also, only the participants added in the review can do the review and change the status. There is no option where anyone from the team can do ...
    14 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

    By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
    Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.