Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

Ideas

Showing 53 of 7027

Maintain model consistency when renaming enum labels

I want a mean to maintain consistency across the entire model when renaming enum labels. This demand is in relation with Ticket TS001987142.
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Service Provider Billing - Add a method for adding work order transactions to be added to a bill batch rather than having to POSTPONE or EXCLUDE transactions

When creating a bill from a Work Order using the action Customer Billing > Create Customer Bill, it is administratively burdensome to have to POSTPONE or EXCLUDE transactions, especially when only a few transactions are to be copied to a bill. ...
about 4 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 0 Future consideration

Rhp 9.0 -> Panel diagram::Widget explicit code execution

Having a container (C++17 map) with attributes, the attributes should have been displayed on the panel diagram, currently the attribute as it is, it's not modifiable nor displayable by the panel diagram widgets.A C++ method should have be called w...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Include Comments with Class Method Parameters

Some code styles include comments for each parameter for a C++ class method. Currently, Rational Rhapsody, when reverse engineering the header, does not connect the comment with the parameter. This creates the unintended result, when we forward ge...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 3 Future consideration

Configure the ability to delete a Bill Batch Line from Customer Billing (SP) application

As per standard Maximo functionality, there is no option to delete bill batch line / work order once it is associated to Bill Batch record in Customer Billing (SP) application. However, there is an alternate option to change Bill Batch Line status...
over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 0 Future consideration

C++11/C++14 "variadic templates" support in Rhapsody's reverse engineering

Hi, We know that currently, Rhapsody‘s reverse engineering does not support C++11 and C++14 (or at least does not support all the C++11/C++14 features) and that it is planned for the next release to update Rhapsody’s features related to C++11/C++1...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 2 Future consideration

On certain items we purchase, we are able to obtain a discount from suppliers. The PO and invoice has the discounted price, which translates into a lower inventory cost and average cost. When we use this item on a workorder and use the workorder to invoice our client, the discounted price is used as the invoice basis. Instead, we would want to keep the margin inhouse.

We negotiate a discount on certains items we purchase, and the discounted price is invoiced to our customer, leaving us with no margin. We would want to keep the margin inhouse.
about 1 year ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 1 Not under consideration

support Eclipse IDE 2020-06 for Rhapsody Workflow / Platform integration

support latest Eclipse IDE 2020‑06 version for Rhapsody Workflow / Platform integration.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Cygwin/MinGW/Linux: ar command with outdated arguments

Currently related Makfile use ARFLAGS=-rvu. But the 'u' modifier requires timestamps, which may be disabled during compile time of ar() with 'D' argument. In this case ar issues a related warning : ar: `u' modifier ignored since `D' is the default...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Include Reverse Engineering (Populate Flowcharts) into the 64-bit version

Currently the reverse engineering is only available within the 32-bit version. But Rhapsody 10 is only available as a 64-bit version. That would mean that the reverse engineering option and especially the function "populate flowchart" is not avail...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 3 Functionality already exists