IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 262 of 5644

Provide some "working mode" options on PA Level as they are usually defined for the complete PA

1) work in module Many customers are working nearly only with requirements that are used in modules. The usual default behaviour is nevertheless still showing core artifacts. Please add a configuration option (on PA Level) where the PA admin or co...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Drawing a line starting and ending at the edges of the same box with the DOORS Next diagram editor

I would like to easily draw a line starting and ending at the edges of the same box with the DOORS Next diagram editor, as shown in the attached image.
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Automatically add name and change date to attribute (e.g. Supplier Remark)

Current behavior: No information is added automatically to text attributes when editing the content of the attribute Requested change: Defined information shall be added automatically to the text attributes as first line when attribute is selected...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

DNG Reviews shall better support the review of several chapters within a Module

We want to do a review of several chapters in a module. Use Case: This happens, for example, if the review shall only include a specific functionality, which is described in one or more chapters within a module. To select any single artefact in th...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Compare Configuration for Reviews

The current compare configuration tool generates differences for the entire component, which often causes the tool to run very slowly and discourages its use by end-user. It would be useful if there was an option within a review to generate a comp...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to Pause DNG Rebase to withstand a server restart.

A Full Rebase of DNG resources can take 5 to 7 days preventing any other type of maintenance which would include a server restart. It would be nice to have this similar to the way LQE indexing can be paused.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Enhanced Link Explorer

The default link explorer is one directional tree display. We need some option for display more rich. For example, it's better for two directional tree display divided by link type. (Please see attached file) I think it's good for users who wan...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

Allow customised export of ReqIF that includes artifacts linked from a module according to attribute value

This is useful for ReqIF practitioners who often have requirement to create ReqIF definitions of specific content. We receive many cases about ways to export ReqIF. In DOORS Classic it is possible to use DXL to dynamically update ReqIF definition,...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to search for text in Review Comments

This request can be an extension to RFE 138229.We use Comments to capture discussions about requirements. It would useful to be able to search for text in the review comments, i.e. via Quick Search.
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Ability to choose if document should be imported in rich text or plain text

When Doors identifies and extracts requirements within a document (Word, Open Office, rich text document) it should be possible to remove the rich text format so it is easy to create and manage RPE-templates without the rich text interfering with ...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.