IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 925 of 5644

Change Set Permissions - Only Owner can modify

Ref to TS001006321 Currently the Charge Set permission are about Creation and Delivery: --Create change sets --Deliver any team member's change sets --Deliver own change sets only Modifying or Changing the content of the Change Set should also b...
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Provide an option to export empty attributes as empty in ReqIF exports.

RequIF is used to share requirement information with suppliers. A round trip process is set up where the OEM exports requirements to ReqIF sends this data to suppliers that import the information, comment and export again. The export is imported b...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Provide an option that prevents adding any new types to the type system in a ReqIF import.

During a ReqIF import, especially (advanced) mode, it can happen that new types in the type system are created. It should be possible to suppress this to not get the well maintained type system contaminated.
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 4 Not under consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDM/RMM links do not have filters like 'Tracked By' and 'Validated By' on RM Project areas i.e user is not able to filter ar.

While linking RMM to RDM, filters like 'Tracked By' & 'Validated By' cannot be found). This behavior is noticed in almost all the RM project areas All the associated applications have filter and specifically RDM/RMM links do not have these fil...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Not under consideration

Glossary items in Excel export

When exporting to Excel then any embedded hyperlinks to the glossary are expressed in text rather than as an actionable URL/hyperlink. Export to Word is correct in that the hyperlink is correctly displayed as a URL.
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Documentation 0 Not under consideration

Property to set tag's & view's description field size

We faced limitation of 449 symbols for tag's description field - in some cases it was not enough for us (eg. when we use tag's descriptions to store some technical information by extensions we develop). We'd like to have property (eg. in RM advanc...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

The requirement picker dialog box should not preselect 'Folders' as 'what to look in'

The requirement Selection dialog box (requirement picker) preselects the 'Folders'option in 'Where to look in' (see attached screenshot) We would like that no selection be made at all. Or we would like to be able to choose wether 'Folders' or 'Mod...
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 4 Not under consideration

Sort based on "modified By"

While it's possible to view the set of artifacts modified by individual associates it makes for a lot of filters and and saved views. It would be beneficial to be able to sort on "Modified By" as you can with such attributes as ID, Name, Type etc.
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Use same name for attribute everywhere

In some cases for system attributes in DNG, the attribute names are displayed differently, e.g. in the item detailed view as "Format" and in the column header as "Artifact Format".Request: Display all system attributes in the same way in the GUI e...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.