IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 931 of 5818

As review participant I like to have an overview of all active reviews for me on "Area" level and over Area's

When one is a frequent reviewer multiple session could be waiting for your feedback. An overview with due dates (preferably a dashboard) help prioritize.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Participant invite mail for review session does not include role in the review

Role "Approver" and "Reviewer" effect the review progress and "Optional reviewer" doesn't. Having the role in the invitation mail states the need for participating.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Participant invite mail for review to be send by creator of the review not the system

Current review invite is send by system CLM.JLS@.com This is not recognized by the users and may end up in spam.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Enable restructuring of team area hierarchy

As the tool currently works, the Team Area Hierarchy in the project area admin page is fixed to the structure it was created in and does not allow for team areas to be restructured. Please allow this functionality so that the hierarchy can be rem...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

"Copy from project" function needs to retain the folder structure for module contents

Currently, what using the above function, the base artefacts within modules are placed in the root folder of the target project. We use this method to copy multiple modules that are connected with links from a reference project into a other projec...
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Validity Summary shall show Summary of all Link Validities including OSLC links

Aligned Solution with IBM: Minimal Solution (Low Hanging Fruit to be fixed immediately): Change the Validity Summary description within DOORS Next. Appearing during hoover over of the Validity summary. See attached screenshots: attachment 2312 (V...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 2 Not under consideration

Procedure for entering test data in QM to be made more flexible

Whenever I enter Test Data in Quality Manager, it makes me select a .csv file which must have variable information in the 1st row and then while publishing, it transposes the same information and gets published. This increases the rework where w...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 1 Not under consideration

Ability to sort "Groups" when viewing grouped artifacts

I've made an attribute similar to a requirement "category" which a numbering scheme to allow grouping of requirements in a logical order when viewed through an artifact "View". However, there is no control over the sort order and defaults from lar...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 0 Not under consideration

Include links option while copying modules from components

When going through the steps below the existing links from Modules copied from different Components to a new Component are not retained while copying the modules using "Copy From Component" option along with "Include Links" checked. Scenario:1. Ol...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Not under consideration

Add a timestamp on UI for when the changes were delivered to an RM stream

A new timestamp "Delivery date" for artifacts could be useful in instances in which a change has been made but yet not delivered. In this case a baseline was created and was noticed to have a Module missing. On further investigation it was found t...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.