IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 925

Provide more public and documented APIs

Description For building automation around the Jazz Platform and esp. DNG we need more public documented APIs. The public APIs shall cover all functionality and information that the private APIs have.The public API's uri shall be mentioned in root...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Not under consideration

Better, more consistent, understandable name for filter "Limit by lifecycle status"

The filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" is very unfortunate. The naming style is totally inconsistent with all the other filter names such as "Artifact type", "Modified by" or "<some_attribute_name>". All these other filter names describ...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

links are not following the data model after change of artifact type

Observed behavior: I figured out that there is a link “Derived from” from a Requirement in one PA to an Information in another PA, which is not supported by the data model. (limited by a defined Linked Constraint) Steps to reproduce: Initially, th...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to query the Work item's that are linked to the Change Sets in DNG

Problem: The RTC application has the options to add conditions and query the results. But we do not see an option to query the Work items that are having the link to the Change sets from DNG. Description: In DNG, we use the requirement review proc...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Not under consideration

Case Sensitive Search within a module

Current Situation : Dialog box “Module Find” has no possibility to do a case sensitive text search within a module. Target Situation : Dialog box “Module Find” offers new check box for case sensitive search. Case sensitive search is a standard fea...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Doors Next Needs Server Side Operational Behaviors

In order to add automation to Requirements Management we need to be able to perform actions when an artifact is saved. This would be similar to the use of preconditions and follow-up actions provided in EWM. Examples of things we would like to do:...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

selective TRS indexing for GC baselines

GC baselines are created routinely, for example at the end a sprint and these can be very large. TRS indexing of these baselines is expensive and there should be an option to omit/selectively index baselines
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

Allow to generate only specific topics in the compare configuration report

The compare configuration report quickly becomes a very large report which can easily crash the DOORS Next server if sufficient heap is not allocated. But even if enough heap is allocated, the EDG component only has 8GB fixed heap and many reports...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Performance 0 Future consideration

Provide option to split configuration comparison report output into multiple files with different section headings

This would be useful because the output of the report can be very large. For us, even a small report is unwieldy at more than 500MB. Having multiple files means that the report is much easier to open and share, rather than being one monolithic fil...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Integrations 0 Future consideration

Provide HTML output option in configuration comparison report

An HTML output option allows customers to generate reports without using Aspose API, which rapidly uses up the heap allocated to the EDG component and causes report generation to fail. This will help customers who have many changes between their ...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Performance 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.