IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 515

Full OSLC support in RQM API

Submitting at request of Christophe Telep and Chris Allen - this came out of the Test Management DPP. The IBM ask was what improvements should be made to the APIs? Here is my OSLC Java developer's response. Please see attached files for detailed c...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Integrations 1 Not under consideration

Enable possibilities to assign custom specific Categories and Attributes to specific roles

Current behavior: ETM does not provide the possibilities to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Requested behavior: ETM shall provide a mechanism to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Wi...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enable possibilities to assign Categories and Attributes to specific item sections

Current behavior: ETM does not provide the possibilities to assign custom categories or attributes to specific sections. E.g. for the item Test Case all Categories and Attributes are combined in the Summary section as a flat list. Requested behavi...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Blocks dependency between test cases

Especially on different abstract levels of testing it is currently a typical use case at some of our teams that there is a dependency between the test cases. E.g. only if specific test cases on component level have been passed it makes sense to ex...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Include Version # in RQM Test Artifacts

Require to be able to query through REST, OSLC or JRS, a Test Artifact's version.
almost 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 1 Not under consideration

While generating Testcase execution records, Looking for option to select multiple attributes from same type to generate a single TCER

For Power Systems configurations we often have to test the integration of different devices in the same system at a time to verify they work together. Sometimes those devices are the same type, like two network adapters, and we need to be able to ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Need to be able to edit/delete Formal Review comments post save.

Once a reviewer has added a comment to a formal review there are not permissions available to allow the owner or admin to edit/delete comments. Suggest adding a permission for a role to be able to edit/delete comments in the formal review. Most li...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

[UFT Adapter] Create a Test Case Result when manually stopping a run

In Engineering Test Management, when using UFT Adapter and running a Test Case, if we decide to manually stop the run by clicking on "Stop Run", a Test Case Execution Record is created, but it does not create any Test Case Results. Currently, this...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Adapter Framework 0 Future consideration

Update the Test Team section so that it can record the test team of the effort for historical purposes; make use of the current functionality and more

The Test Team section can be extremely useful. It pulls in the team members currently loaded within a QM Test Team so that everyone involved in testing is listed within the plan. This is really great functionality. However, when the members of th...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide a project property to disallow TCER generation and removal for retired test cases

Retired test cases should not be used for testing, so TCER operations should be prohibitable.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Administration 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.