Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

PINNED Enable inventory reservation automatic cron task for specific site
Advantage : Enable the cron for specific site which is necessary. Summary: In Maximo, we have more than 50 Active sites. When we try to enable inventory reservation automatic cron task for specific site, There is no Cron Parameters are available....
PINNED Power BI capability alignment between Desktop vs embedded solution
Requesting Customer: Fraser Property but this would benefit all customers using Envizi Power BI capability Business Impact: The Frasers Property Team have recently explored the use of the embeded PowerBI functionality and have found that there are...

All ideas

Showing 2734

Will the OXF library in Rhapsody 8.3.1 work in a Java 11 environment?

I understand that Rhapsody 8.3.1 is officially supported by Java 7.However, we have confirmed that it also works with Java 8.Will it work with Java 11?Please let me know if you have any experience.If not, please let me know the version of Rhapsody...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 0 Future consideration

EWM 7.0.1 client hangs with OOM with 100+ feed connections

Based on discussion in the case and what was originally opened as a defect and APAR inhttps://jazz.net/jazz/resource/itemName/com.ibm.team.workitem.WorkItem/491674, the EWM team has been unable to recreate.As a concession, Alex has agreed that thi...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Performance 1 Future consideration

Metric Tabular Reports are missing Export button in TRIRIGA 3.5.1.3

Metric Tabular Reports are missing Export button in TRIRIGA 3.5.1.3. We had Export option till TRIRIGA platform 3.3.2.4.
about 7 years ago in IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 2 Future consideration

Enhance Rhapsody to log more information when using Diffmerge Command Line options.

System: IBM Engineering Systems Design Rhapsody DiffmergeActor: All Developers using Diffmerge to merge their changes into the model. Rhapsody is a commonly used product that a Design and development tool in our software development lifecycle. Des...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

[Gateway] Doors baselines analysis/synchronization should be skipped

In a Gateway project, processing of Doors modules takes some time during Gateway analysis and Add high level requirements operations.Especially when Doors modules are big/many.A good improvement would be the following proposal:Gateway should analy...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Reports 1 Future consideration

Enhance Filter Options for Duration Field in Graphical Applications

When filtering WO data on the Graphical Scheduling application, other columns provide operators such as <, >, <=, >=. For the numeric column of DURATION, those specific operator functions are not available. If possible, request adding ...
over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Scheduler 2 Future consideration

STM and reception inherited from super class are not deleted automatically when user deletes the generalization

Class A inherits STM and ports from its base Class B.When developer deletes inheritance from Class B, ports are deleted automatically but STM are not deleted.We expect Rhapsody to delete STM automatically as well as ports after deleting the genera...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Complete relations should be able to draw connectors on IBDs using inherited port and part belongs to an inherited block

Observed Behaviour: If you have 2 ports only the flow is reconstructed in a IBD using Layout completion but not the connector, even if it is available in the model. This happens when the port is inherited and the part belongs to an inherited block...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Better controls over Kanban Cycle Time, Lead Time calcuations

Capability Needed: The ability to configure the specific events that cause cycle time calculation to begin and end. Also need to specify separate events for lead time calculation.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Unassigned 5 Future consideration

Add Capability to Publish to non-Default Versions of ESRI in Spatial

The current Spatial Integration only integrates to the Default version of the ESRI MapServer. There is no ability to specify a non-Default Version. This is not considered best integration practice by ESRI according to our ESRI team.
over 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Spatial 1 Future consideration