IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Test Management

Showing 523

In Execution Schedule, I would like to be able to change in-bulk all the Test Case Execution Records' machines

Currently, if you add multiple Test Case Execution Records (TCERs) to an Execution Schedule, you are able to modify the Machine individually. If I have hundreds of TCERs, I have to perform the same task hundred times. The idea is to have a simil...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 1 Future consideration

Add column to display Machine name in Test Execution

Having multiple adapters in the same machine is a supported scenario but, as a user, it is not possible to know which adapter was selected (or to confirm your selection was indeed applied). You are able to change the machine and in the popup wind...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

ETM Reconcile Improvement for named Test Case

Current Functionality When reconciling requirements in collections, test cases may be generated for requirements using the requirement name as the test case name. When using Link Validity, the test case is marked as suspect when the requirement na...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Efficient removal of a large amount of Test Cases from a Test Suite.

It is easy in Browser Views of Test Cases to define filters on a subset, select Test Case and then assign all selected Test Cases to a Test Suite in one step. However, the counterpart is missing to remove a lot of Test Cases from a Test Suite just...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Automatic removal of a Test Case from a Test Plan not before the last Test Suite containing this Test Case has been removed.

When a Test Suite is attached to a Test Plan, all Test Cases of the Test Suite are attached to the Test Plan, and when the Test Suite is removed, the Test Cases are also removed. However, if a Test Case is contained in several Test Suites attached...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Add more DNG columns to the Requirements Reconciliation Page

Add more DNG columns to the Requirements Reconciliation Page
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 6 Not under consideration

Formal Review comments should be able to responded to and closed an owner.

If a reviewer raised comments in a formal review there should be a way to resolve/reject the comments to alow the approver to make an informed decision. At the moment there is not way to determine if the comments are valid/resolved before approvin...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Test Step comments need to support more than 128 characters

When trying to enter comments against a test step it is limited in length. Ideally we would be able to attach multiple comments in RTF format or allowed to attach long text to capture comments from test step.
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Add a filter for "has RFT test script" for test case list

In the test case list, or the test case list in a Test Plan, it would be easier if I can select to list all the test cases that has a RFT test script. Then I will be able to select all of them and invoke the testing. We are currently only using RF...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 1 Not under consideration

CLA execution cannot handle the network interruptions at test machine or RQM server

Currently in the CLA, when the execution completes, the adapter tries to post the data and fails with an exception "Failed to send data" where the execution stops.This is mostly observed when there are many Test Cases to be executed in a Test Suit...
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.