Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 921

Review of a Change Set

Reviews are unnecessarily restricted from being performed on a change set. The tool should be able to provide a contextual review of a change set prior to delivery so that defects don't make it into a production stream.
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next 1 Future consideration

Need a tool or feature to fix type system inconsistencies

LQE RB Reports don't resolve when RDF URI Conflicts exist within ELM Properties. During Report Creation Time, conflicts appear on the screen for report builders. These conflicts should never be allowed to coexist in the same ELM instance. No provi...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 1 Future consideration

To be able to control read access via components in DNG.

We require to be able to control read access via components in DNG. With this feature implemented we can have granular user access control.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

Polygon Support in Diagram Editor

The DOORS Diagram editor lacks support for polygons. Polygon editing is a basic feature of any diagram creation utility. Without it, we have to use a third-party editor to create images and wireframes as a part of our requirements, and then config...
about 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 4 Not under consideration

DNG Show Columns - Prefered Attributes

In a DNG module, when you right click on the column header a popup is displayed with a list of attributes in "Show columns" section. In this list, you find : the attributes displayed in the current view (with a check) other attributes (random list...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 1 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Reports take a long time

For a review packet. Reports take a long time. Takes 20 min. Last day of sprint it is a long time to wait, especially if multiple modules at 20 min each it adds up.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Performance 2 Future consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration