Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Categories Work Items
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 29, 2024

Code Review status dependency on Work Item status

Why is it useful?

Effective EWM v7.x:

Ø  the Code Review Tool doesn’t leverage the work item’s lifecycle status or its approval mechanism like it did with the older RTC v6.x.

Ø  the Code Review Tool has its own in-built independent approval mechanism.

Ø  the Code Review Tool has its own in-built independent statuses representing the status of the Code Review cycle

For compliance reasons it would be useful if work status can only be moved to “closed” status only if the code review status is minimum at “closed” state.

Who would benefit from it?

Code Review author and reviewers. Software Quality Assurance team.

How should it work?

Work item should not be permitted to transition to “closed” state if the code review status is not in “closed” state.

Idea priority High
Needed By Quarter
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 6, 2024
    The EWM Ideas Review board looked at this request and decided to keep it on the Backlog as an uncommitted candidate for a future release.