Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Categories Feature
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 22, 2020

Provide an option that prevents adding any new types to the type system in a ReqIF import.

During a ReqIF import, especially (advanced) mode, it can happen that new types in the type system are created. It should be possible to suppress this to not get the well maintained type system contaminated.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 20, 2020

    We understand the business justification to this enhancement request but must understand the functional enhancement and use case better.

    When the supplier makes comments on the requirements, which RM too is the supplier using?
    Does the supplier make a change to the type system or does it remain the same?

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 20, 2020

    Business Justification: The customer spends a fortune on maintaining a consistent type system and consider it not acceptable to get their type system contaminated by a random ReqIF import. Currently it is impossible to prevent that from happening.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 19, 2020

    When data is reimported it will need to be received back from the supplier with the same data types or the import would be difficult. It sounds like the data is received back from the supplier has a different ID to the type exported. Can you confirm this is the case?

    If you receive data back from a supplier with a different type to that exported, what are you suggesting we do to resolve the situation? Selecting an attribute for import will need to create a new type if DOORS Next feels that the type does not exist.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 29, 2020

    Also see TS003974857 where this happens in the context of the user.