This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
All email send by QM (and I guess RM, but our today issue is related to QM) need consistency in link used.
Exemple :
After declaring a Formal review , user receive an email ("New Review")=> this first email link to a GC stream
Next, user receive a remminder email like "Due today: 'Review'" => this email link to local stream
GC and local configuration are not easy to understand for every user, we expect that the tool give the user key information to use it in a way that limite user error.
Having an email redirecting in a context and an other email redirecting in another context (for the same artefact in same GC) is misleading.
There was PH23830/DT364275 that was supposed to fix this issue, but it's not the case. Support now says that it works as expected.
Idea priority | Low |
Needed By | Not sure -- Just thought it was cool |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.