Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 7, 2022

Changes to system provided queries and searches

Being the Maximo Administrator, my experience tells me that some upgrade of my Maximo environment provides changes to default where clauses in the DB config. Hence, I kindly ask to have a report telling the difference between current standard where clauses and the ones in the upgrade package, so that I will know if I need to take any action before releasing the Prod environment to my users. I.e. the standard search for Possession candidates. Has the upgrade package done any changes to this search?
Idea priority High
Needed By Quarter
  • Admin
    JORDAN SMITH
    Reply
    |
    Jun 5, 2024

    Thank you for taking the time to provide your ideas to IBM. We truly value our relationship with you and appreciate your willingness to share details about your experience, your recommendations, and ideas.


    I am sorry to inform you that our team has evaluated the request and has determined that it cannot be implemented in the near-term.


    If you would like to be involved in the features of these new applications, or other Maximo modernization efforts at IBM, please email smithjor@us.ibm.com to become part of our sponsored user group, which is a program where you and people in your organization become active participants in the Maximo design process, working alongside our design teams to help us create great future experiences for real target user

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 7, 2022

    Hi Tom,

    Very good you have looked into this. In my reply from 24 May, please find a screen shot showing where in MAS the query is stored.


    Kind regards,

    Michael

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 6, 2022

    Hi Michael


    You mentioned this:


    In case an upgrade on EAM as well as on MAS causes that our adjusted and configured possession candidate search will be overwritten with the default provided query or an optimized new query, we would very much like to know in advance or at least active a comparison tool which can do a compare between e.g. our DEV and our PROD environment.


    Can you clarify where you are maintaining this query, in which application? I don't see a place in the Security Groups application where you maintain queries (but I'm not an expert in the security group application)


    thanks

    Tom



  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 24, 2022

    Hi Tom,


    Thanks for your comment on our idea.

    Having implemented the Work Order app for CI (PLUSXWO) back in January 2022, we have also implemented the centralized and OOTB CI candidate search for possessions.

    Previously we had a Sund & Bælt local implementation for finding candidates for both possessions as well as for road blocks.

    Our experience from previous upgrades of our Maximo EAM (ver. 7.x), we have learned that each upgrade provides changes to security groups. I believe this is necessary in order for us to be able to utilize new applications.

    In case an upgrade on EAM as well as on MAS causes that our adjusted and configured possession candidate search will be overwritten with the default provided query or an optimized new query, we would very much like to know in advance or at least active a comparison tool which can do a compare between e.g. our DEV and our PROD environment.

    Saying that, in case any future upgrades will never update any customer configured changes to queries, which support OOTB functionality, I believe such tool won’t be necessary.

    Above describes our “protection” of working functionality.

    The other way around could be that new functionality comes with a MAS upgrade. The Sund & Bælt implemented candidate search doesn’t scope this new functionality, but it is assessed it would benefit our business processes.

    A tool to do a compare the upgraded search/query in DEV up against the current working in PROD would be an excellent tool.


    Kind regards,

    Michael

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 23, 2022

    Hi Can you clarify which 'Where' Clauses you are referencing in DB Configure application? is it the clause tied to an Object Relationship?