Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 2, 2025

Meter Based PMs should have a tolerance in meter units which will cause the work order to be generated early

Time based PMs have a Lead Time that allows work orders to be generated early to provide time to assemble materials, external services or tools necessary to perform the work. There is a field on the Preventive Maintenance Meter tab called Generate WO Ahead By (PMMETER.TOLERANCE) which according to the original design was for information purposes. This field should be used to generate a work order earlier than the due date. The number of meter units would be multiplied by the average units/day to determine a Lead Time (Days) on each meter. This would be a non-persistent (and read-only) field to help understand which meter, or if mixed meter/time based was the driver for the generation of the work order. 

If no time based frequency then the meter with the greatest Lead Time would be added to the Slack Time to determine whether to generate the work order early.
If mixed time and meter based frequencies then the greater of any Meter Lead Time or if Lead Time Active then the Lead Time (Days) (PM.LEADTIME) would be added to the Slack Time to determine whether to generate the work order early.

The use of the Generate WO Ahead By should not reduce the Units To Go or affect the Estimated Next Due Date because this pulls forward the Target Start date on the next generated work order. This is how it is working today (MAS 9.0, 9.1), but this is having the same effect as reducing the frequency by the same value. For example, if average units/day is 10 and meter frequency is 100 and Generate WO Ahead By is 10 then a work order is generated every 9 days instead of 10 days. It would be the same as if you set the frequency to 90 instead of 100 and left Generate WO Ahead By as 0. The result is the current use of Generate WO Ahead By is causing more work orders to be generated each year than the frequency would suggest. 

There is a case TS013533562 and APAR DT248195 which references this issue. The APAR should now be changed to remove the code that uses the Generate WO Ahead By to reduce the Units To Go.

The Generate WO Ahead By field should have no impact on the Estimated Next Due Date or the Earliest Next Due Date. 

The Generate WO Ahead By field should have no impact on PM forecast dates.

The Generate WO Ahead By on a Meter based PM in a PM hierarchy would be triggered by the meter in one of the PMs in the hierarchy which had the greatest value in the new non-persistent field Lead Time (Days). 

Idea priority Urgent
Needed By Not sure -- Just thought it was cool
  • Guest
    Jul 23, 2025

    Agree with that especially for irregular and fluctuating readings which already can’t be dependable to use the average method only 

  • Guest
    Jul 22, 2025

    we are ok with this field and we are already using , working successfully