This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Author: Hanna Selkirk
We are trying to come up with a solution to get Maximo to be more sophisticated in what is deemed billable and not. During our investigations we have noticed the following which we think is an error that should be corrected.
1. Create a work order in Work Order Tracking (SP)
2. Apply a Customer Agreement and a Price Schedule
Upon this action the work order becomes represented in the object PLUSPTOBEBILLED
3. Approve work order
4. Add one line for all resources as actual (Labor, Material, Service and Fee & Charge)
Below is now TRUE for all resource lines.
LABTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
MATUSETRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
SERVRECTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
TOOLTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
PLUSPGBTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
And for the work order the following is true.
WORKORDER.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 1
The Work order is now represented in object PLUSPTOBEBILLED and the transctions are represented in object PLUSTOBEBILLEDTR
5. Now set ALL resouce lines to PLUSPTRANSBILLSTATE.TRANSBILLST = EXCLUDE
Below is now TRUE for all resource lines.
LABTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
MATUSETRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
SERVRECTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
TOOLTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
PLUSPGBTRANS.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
And for the work order the following is true.
WORKORDER.PLUSPUNBILLEDTRANS = 0
The transactions are no longer represented in object PLUSTOBEBILLEDTR
However, the work order is still represented in object PLUSPTOBEBILLED, which is what we would like to question.
So there are no longer any billable transactions(resource lines) on the work order but Maximo is still considering the work order to be billable.
6. Close the work order
7. Create a bill batch for the Agreement and click on Select Order > Select Order and the work order will be represented in the list over billable work orders, eventhough there are no transactions(Resource lines) to be billed.
We are looking for a way to make Maximo more sophisticated in the selection of what work orders are billable or not which we would like to be able to decide on Price schedule level. Our though was to use the PLUSPTRANSBILLSTATE.TRANSBILLST = EXCLUDE to be set on all created resource lines when a work order has a specific price schedule applied.
This theory is not working now since the work order is still represented in object PLUSPTOBEBILLED even when all transactions are excluded.
We would like to have this functionality fixed so that when the work order no longer has any billable transactions, the work order should be removed from object PLUSPTOBEBILLED
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Thank you for submitting your enhancement request. We think this is a good idea and have it targeted for a future release.