This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Thank you for your submission. There are no plans at this time to change this behavior in the next several releases.
As Craig indicated, I have 250,000 assets, integrated from GIS, all of them in various routes as route stops (loaded in an initial data load via Excel application import).
Thousands of assets get changed each year (new, update, decom). So I need to refresh the assets/route stops accordingly. The only OOB way to refresh route stops in Maximo is to delete and replace. But I don't have a good way to delete 250,000 routes stops in Maximo right now. So that's where this RFE come in.
As Craig says it would be useful to know why you are deleting so many stops in one operation.
It could indicate a process fault e.g people not creating things in the right order or not thinking through the routes that they actually need.
If there is a process fault then correcting the process may remove the need for the RFE. I can see there is potential value in the RFE e.g. if a dataload error occurs.
While I have voted yes, my second thought is that isn't the volume you're indicating core reason that it should be a new route. I do appreciate that you (most likely) then don't want to have to go to each PM, master PM, or asset template that it's used.
Why are you need to change so much volume? How are you applying all the asset/locations in the first place?