Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 3, 2025

Allow Scheduler to operate independently as a standalone MAS application, decoupled from Manage.

In multi-instance MAS deployments, organisations may need to coordinate a single mobile workforce across multiple environments. Currently, Scheduler is tightly coupled with Manage, which restricts its use in cross-instance coordination. Decoupling Scheduler would enable centralised scheduling without requiring all environments to run Manage, simplifying architecture and licensing, and enabling more flexible workforce deployment strategies. This would benefit large organisations managing distributed contracts or business units under separate MAS workspaces or instances.

Idea priority Medium
Needed By Quarter
  • Guest
    Jun 3, 2025

    Thanks Pedro for the detailed response and for outlining the potential directions – really helpful to see this broken down so clearly.

    I fully appreciate that decoupling Scheduler entirely from Manage is a longer-term ambition, especially given the dependencies on legacy Maximo Framework components. That said, my main driver here is not necessarily to remove Manage altogether, but rather to enable a single, unified view and control of the workforce across multiple MAS instances.

    In our setup, we operate several MAS workspaces (and in some cases, completely separate instances) to support different business lines. However, our workforce is shared across these environments. The current architecture doesn’t allow us to centrally manage scheduling without workarounds or duplicate deployments.

    I'm absolutely open to alternatives—whether it's the mid-term dashboard-style model or integration via MIF—as long as the end result allows us to schedule work centrally, allocate resources intelligently across environments, and avoid data fragmentation or excessive complexity.

    Looking forward to continuing this conversation and seeing how we can move towards a scalable, enterprise-ready scheduling model that supports these kinds of deployments

  • Admin
    Pedro Solfa Spadacini
    Jun 3, 2025

    Hi All,

    This sounds like a very interesting direction, but I'd like to clarify a few key points before moving forward. It's important to confirm some foundational aspects related to architecture and integration:

    • A Manage instance will still be required to support the core scheduling functions, similar to how Mobile consumes resources today.

    • The potential for new dashboard applications based on the Maximo Application Framework is promising. However, it's important to note that the existing graphical applications are built on the legacy Maximo Framework.

    • Decoupling modules such as Work Orders, Resources, Calendars, and Shifts from Manage—while still maintaining their relationship within the Scheduler application—is conceptually sound but would likely be a longer-term goal.

    With that in mind, here’s a summary of the potential options and associated timelines:

    1. Schedule Dashboards similar to Mobile, enabling multiple Scheduler instances connected to a single Manage instance – Mid-term (approx. 1 year)

    2. Standalone Scheduler Manage Module, decoupled from core Manage and integrated via Maximo Integration Framework (MIF) – Long-term (2–3 years)

    3. Completely new Scheduler Application, not dependent on Manage, consuming resource and work order data via APIs – To Be Determined (TBD)

    Please feel free to share your thoughts, additional needs, or ideas related to this discussion.

  • Guest
    Jun 3, 2025

    For this type of organisation I can see huge benefits of having a decoupled Schedling tool that could pull from various instances of manage.