This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
I ran into a use case today where this idea could have really helped. A customer is using nearly all of their AppPoints consistently and they want to have a vendor come in and do some work on a temporary basis. To stay in compliance they will most likely have to purchase more AppPoints even though the vendor also has AppPoints that they could potentially use. If I could have deployed a second SLS server or deployed two license files in parallel we could use the AppPoints that are already being paid for.
Could you provide an update on this idea? It is a bit older and I have my fingers crossed that it might be delivered in 9.1.
Today, AppPoints are provided through a single license key file generated by a single license owning organization. This limitation does not support enterprise-wide Maximo implementations funded from multiple operating units and serviced by many third-party service providers and consultants (system integrators like financial, GIS, etc).
Use Cases:
- Service Providers want to maintain App Point licensing for their users to consume, seperately from the Maximo end client
- Different corporate entities want to seperately pay for and provide licensing for their users
Dave Gasdia @ IBM stated that the legacy token server configuration allowed for providing seperate Administrative and User license keys and suggested that we submit this Idea to have similar functions pulled forward. The suggestion here is to link to mulitiple license servers instead of supplying seperate license keys.
Why do seperate license servers? Organizations that have users logging into multiple client systems don't want to license the same user for each system.
Please provide use case(s) and problem(s) that needs to be solved.