IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 167

RM-DNG Change Set Merge Needs to be at the Attribute Level

The current DoorsNext configuration management Change Set merge process occurs at the Artifactlevel such that two Change Sets which modify the same Artifact but differentAttributes will show a conflict that has to be manually addressed. This reque...
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG review session improvements

The current requirement review interface has some deficiencies when it comes to filtering artifacts based on comments. Currently, the user must manually scroll for artifacts with the comment indicator icon. The following would be appreciated: 1. W...
13 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to select all dependencies when delivering changes between streams

When delivering changes from one stream to another, we occasionally encounter dependencies that we may want to ignore. We must select each dependency to ignore one by one. If a "Select All" button could be added, this would save us time. We've had...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to search on specific attributes

My team would find it very useful to select specific attributes to search while using the Find function. This would reduce time for searches (our documents are quite large and have a wide variety of attributes) and would help us zero in on exactly...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enforce Link Constraints when User changes Artifact Type

Enforced Link Constraints enable consistency of trace and trace reports. Link constraints are assigned to artifact types. Since a user can change an artifact type, the link constraints for the new type should be applied during the change. Should a...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enhance the import function of reqif/reqifz in DOORS Next

When importing data into DOORS using a reqif format file, it is necessary to support attribute mapping operations on the UI interface. We need to be able to visually see the Property list in the source file and configure the mapping relationship b...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Future consideration

Currently you can view some attributes of the linked requirement except if that linked requirement is on a different server. We need to see the attribute values for linked requirements even if on a different server.

The current behavior does not provide the user with consistent behavior. We have the outgoing link configured so that we can see the state of the requirement that is linked. This isnt capability is very useful but in the current implementation it ...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Make the common permission properties editable in 1 location

User Permission change to Attributes at the Project Level for Multi-Component Projects User defined permissions to artifacts and attributes are managed at the Project scope till Configuration Enabled then at the Stream scope per component. When pr...
23 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Functional Safety Baseline Integrity Assurance

ELM could be used in support of Functional Safety Development Applications but only after qualifying the system and its Enterprise usage to 3rd Party Certification Body. As this comes at great expense to the ELM Customer and having just received t...
23 days ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Future consideration

Display progress bar while exporting data from Module

When we export the data from Module in either csv/xls/xlsx, it just gives a message saying "The export operation has started. The process might take a considerable amount of time, depending on how many requirements are being exported." So, the use...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.