IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My votes: Usability

Showing 227 of 5818

As an User, I would like to be given an option to duplicate the history content along with the copied artifact

Right now when you duplicate an artifact, the history doesn't come along with it and the new artifact is created with only 1 entry in the history, telling it was just created. Some use-cases might require the history of that artifact, mainly if th...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to be able to Export Comprehensive a TSER and have the TCERs and Test Case Results

If I export to PDF a Test Suite Execution Record (TSER) as Comprehensive, we do not get the Test Case Execution Records (TCER) (and the results) that are associated with that TSER in the PDF file. Steps to Reproduce:1. Create a Test Script with co...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

As a User, I would like to change the name of a Query and the widget associated with it to change as well

Problem: If I have a Widget with a query called "TCERs1" and I change the query to be named "TCERs2", the widget won't be updated and will still show as "TCERs1". The data returned will also not change, if in "TCERs2" I change the filter. Steps to...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Is a defect

Enable possibilities to assign custom specific Categories and Attributes to specific roles

Current behavior: ETM does not provide the possibilities to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Requested behavior: ETM shall provide a mechanism to assign custom categories or attributes to specific process roles. Wi...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enable possibilities to assign Categories and Attributes to specific item sections

Current behavior: ETM does not provide the possibilities to assign custom categories or attributes to specific sections. E.g. for the item Test Case all Categories and Attributes are combined in the Summary section as a flat list. Requested behavi...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Need to be able to edit/delete Formal Review comments post save.

Once a reviewer has added a comment to a formal review there are not permissions available to allow the owner or admin to edit/delete comments. Suggest adding a permission for a role to be able to edit/delete comments in the formal review. Most li...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Update the Test Team section so that it can record the test team of the effort for historical purposes; make use of the current functionality and more

The Test Team section can be extremely useful. It pulls in the team members currently loaded within a QM Test Team so that everyone involved in testing is listed within the plan. This is really great functionality. However, when the members of th...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Transfer changes of artifacts performed in a process conform way (i.e., not violating any preconditions) to a child stream.

Description: Currently, the Preconditions & Follow-up Actions (especially: “Disallow Saving of Test Cases with State Approved or Retired”) prevents to transfer changes of an artifact from a parent to a child stream, although the changes where ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Include All Tests in a Single Review

Enhance test review functionality to encapsulate a baseline/snapshot of all of the tests (test cases and scripts) in a single review, with inline comments.
almost 7 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Inherit the categories to the child test artifacts or sub artifacts in Test management

in the ETM tool, as per the IBM meta model Test case must have Test script. We have brought in lot of categories which are global in nature and it is really cumber some when i create Test script from the Testcase as these values which are filled a...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 4 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.