IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 227 of 5175

links are not following the data model after change of artifact type

Observed behavior: I figured out that there is a link “Derived from” from a Requirement in one PA to an Information in another PA, which is not supported by the data model. (limited by a defined Linked Constraint) Steps to reproduce: Initially, th...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Undo Function

An Undo Function similar to CTRL-Z in Office Applications is requested. Missing undo functionality for recent edit steps, especially for unintentional changes by “clicking and typing somewhere” in the req. definition or in another attribute in com...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in modules prevent base artifact linking via project admin setting

In the system engineering all customers working in DNG with in the module mode. The default requirement engineer works inside a module and is not aware of the background settings in DNG, eg the artifacts are stored in a module folder and there is ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

Remind users if a Change Set (CS) is older than one week and not delivered yet

Current behavior: Currently a lot of change sets are created by users but forgotten that they are open or not found any more, since it's not known how to find them.Finally we have a lot of old CS also containing changes no one knows if they are st...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Automatic Detection of Glossary Terms

When writing text (artifact content), DNG shall automatically detect if a word is defined as glossary term.If a glossary term is created, DNG should automatically detect duplicated and give a warning.Use Case: Improved Usage of Glossary Terms; Con...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Composite Delivery Change Set - Editable Name

When delivering Change Sets from one stream to another, a Composite Delivery Change Set is create that contains the list of Change Set that were Delivered. The name of that Composite Delivery Change Set is of that pattern: "Composite Delivery from...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DOORS Next search shall include headings

Current situation: when a filter is applied, artifacts fulfilling the condition are shown one after the other without any indication related to the hierarchy or module structure. This make it hard for the user to identify to which chapter an artif...
10 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Under review

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Under review

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.