Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 238

Progress needs to be seen on Excel/CSV exports

Progress bar needs to be seen on Excel/CSV exports.Currently, no progress to be seen, if CSV fails or does not complete, we are none the wiser.Basic Usability topic. Request: Progress bar
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

View of linked files in SCM to requirements in DNX not possible

It is possible to link artifacts from RTC SCM to requirements in DOORSNG. It is possible to see the linking of the artifacts to the requirements in the Eclipse client by right click on the artifact. (this method is not applicable, if you want to c...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Drag and Drop of Columns

In DNG it would be usefull, if one could rearrange columns by means of drag and drop
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Export Compare Configuration for specific Module or Change Set

The 7.0.2 release includes a compare configuration report, which looks super promising. Does this report give the ability to only export a give module? The options appear to only include as specific as Artifacts, which I imagine includes all artif...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Project option: "No text font" all requirements will be written as plain text.

Having this option on, will make all printouts look so much better, no jumping fonts, due to copy paste from different sources. Today it takes a lot of effort to check all text so they are "plain" and will get the desired font of the report. Now t...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Move modules to different component or project area

Create the possibility to move modules to different components and project areas. Moving an artifact as compound operation is requested.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration