Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5984 of 5984

Historical Reporting on DOORS Next and ETM Artifacts

It is currently possible to create historical reports through JRS Report Builder on EWM artifacts. However, it is not possible to historically report on any DOORS Next or ETM artifacts because they use the LQE data source (or in our case, LQE usin...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Reporting / JRS 1 Future consideration

PostgreSQL as Database for Maximo

We would like IBM to certify/support Maximo 7.6.1.x on PostgreSQL database. Considering the advancement in technology and organizations moving towards open-source databases like MongoDB and PostgreSQL, we would like to have Maximo also to be supp...
about 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) 3 Future consideration

Inserting images and arrays in richtext atributes in DOORS Next

With DOORS Next today, we can add images in the main attribute (content) of requirement artifacts because it is of richtext type. But there is no richtext type available (like in DOORS classic). Projects need to enrich their specification modules ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Navigate between workorders without back to list

The ideia is to develop some way to navigate between workorder records click on a sign to move to next workorder in the sequence or swiping between each other inside the record.
about 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 0 Future consideration

Provide the option to add an Asset to a WO using the map

The usecase is to select an Asset to add it to the workorder from the map. The Field engineer needs to be able to select the asset that he worked on (e.g. a gas pipe or electricity cable) to the Workorder. Or change it when the wrong asset was lin...
about 2 months ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 0 Future consideration

Partner Products Available in Suite Navigator

As an IBM Partner we develop our own products to complement MAS Manage, we would like these to be available in MAS Core / Suite Navigator.
about 2 months ago in IBM MAS - Common Services 1 Functionality already exists

Allow users to change the order of responses to questions in the Inspection Forms

When creating forms, once out in the field you may discover a change in the order of responses is needed. Right now you can move the questions up and down, but not the responses to the questions, or if there is a way to do so please let me know.
3 months ago in IBM MAS - Mobile 0 Future consideration

Restricting SRM group-level users to access group-level disclosures not organization-level disclosures

We are implementing and deploying Envizi for users at organization level and group level. Group level users can't view organizational level data, therefore, It would be beneficial and will enhance the overall security and privacy of the reported d...
4 months ago in IBM Envizi - ESG Suite / Base Platform 1

Allowing people to choose fiscal year when looking at a site or account summary and performance tracking

Many of us look at emissions/energy use by fiscal year, fiscal year over fiscal year, and in comparison to our baseline year which is a fiscal year. It would just give more flexibility in how we can look at data.
3 months ago in IBM Envizi - ESG Suite / Base Platform 1 Functionality already exists

Log to track the changes of consumer key in all servers.

The log information to track the change of consumer key in all servers would help us to notify when the consumer key is unregistered and be able to investigate the root cause from the following data. the username who change the consumer key. the d...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration