Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 1957

Maximo Message Tracking throws error "Content is not allowed in prolog" in SystemOut.log

Problem: When using Publish Channels with an XSLT transformation and sending JSON data when viewing the data in Message Tracking it produces an error in SystemOut.log "Problem converting bytes to documentorg.jdom.input.JDOMParseException: Error on...
about 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) / Integration 4 Not under consideration

Display Test Script Step Result status in the DNG "validated by" colum

As it is currently displayed with the status of test case results, we would like to see the Test Script Step Result status displayed (as an icon or else?) next to the link "validated by" (from the requirement to the test srcipt test)
over 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Add a timeout feature to disconnect Rhapsody from licence server

We are currently using Tokens to manage usage with DOORS + ELM + Rhapsody. We found that tokens are used unnecessarily as users are not closing Rhapsody during the day (Rhapsody can be opened 24/7). So Tokens are never released and it causes the f...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 3 Not under consideration

make EWM server installable from a RPM

In order to install an EWM server on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (among others) we need a RPM. So it would be useful for IBM to provide one or more RPMs on jazz.net in order to install an EWM server and its optional components : CCM, JTS, DCC, etc. T...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Installation 1 Not under consideration

It should be possible to better control who gets e-mail notification in DNG

When someone create a comment in a DNG artifact, by default the user who created this artifact automatically still listed as recipient in recipient field, even if he no longer is a member of the project area which this artifact belongs to.
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration