IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 2885

Market-based emissions to include all Scope 2 sources

Market-based emissions in PowerReports and other reports should always include all Scope 2 sources. Currently, it is only showing market-based "electricity" but I should be able to view Scope 2 Market-Based Emissions which includes not only electr...
3 months ago in IBM Envizi - ESG Suite / Scope 1&2 GHG Accounting & Reporting 1 Future consideration

Make preconditions' default names consistent

Right now, the preconditions' names are not consistent, which can be slightly confusing when going through the list. 1) Using Disallow and Do not allow. As an example: Disallow Execution of Test Case Execution Record if owner is not executing it D...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

Exporting Rank of WorkItems

Currently a plan is some of the main central items within a project. Here all given work items are planned, grouped and even prioritized due to a rank method. If you now need to migrate a Project Area from one server to another one, it is necessar...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / API 1 Future consideration

Installation procedure should also clearly define the RBAC policies/cluster role bindings /Certificate issuer policies

Similarly, due to segregation of duties, even namespace admins might not have access to all the APIs provided by the operators and to create instances/workspaces. RBAC policies might need to be defined in-order to gain access to the operator APIs ...
3 months ago in IBM MAS - Common Services 1 Future consideration

Installation procedure should not be restricted to just one deployment engine

Though Ansible is robust automation deployment engine, not every organization might be using Ansible. In our case, we use Kustomize manifest with ArgoCD based deployment. So, installation procedure should not be restricted to just one deployment e...
3 months ago in IBM MAS - Common Services 1 Future consideration

The installation procedure should be split into tasks which have to be executed by cluster admin and those that can be executed by namespace admins

Major OEMs will have their own cloud solutions/Open Shift platforms. Open Shift cluster will be managed by their infrastructure/engineering team. Application team may not/will not have cluster admin access to the Open Shift cluster, since there wi...
3 months ago in IBM MAS - Common Services 1 Future consideration

Autolock artifacts when approved or peer reviewed

It would make the process more efficiency if there were a way to auto-lock the requirement artifacts when the status is changed to "approved" or peer reviewed? Scenario: - We use peer review record to go the RM review process. - We will have multi...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

In CCM number of requirements(count) of type implements requirements, attached to a work items is not visible we are currently counting manually.

It will be helpful to see the count of the links. 1. Helps in calculate the load on work item by knowing count of the links. 2. Reduces manual effort of counting 3. It can be integrated visa versa also means in DNG to count the number of work item...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Work Items 1 Future consideration

Restricting Access at Stream Level

Current RM access regulation is only possible at project level, or at a team level. There should be a way to restrict access at stream level. When we want to restrict users to work/edit only on their respective stream and not the Master stream, th...
over 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 5 Future consideration

Include Preventive Maintenance part of the Service Provider Applications

Make the application Preventive Maintenance part of the Service Provider solution. An application Preventive Maintenance (SP). In this new application it should be possible to associate a PM record to a Customer and apply Customer Agreements and P...
almost 5 years ago in IBM MAS - Service Provider 2 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.