IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM

Showing 483 of 5317

Makefile for MINGW: LIBS should use same path separator as INST_LIBS, OXF_LIBS

Currently only variable LIBS seems to use a backslash \ as path separator. Other variables e.g. INST_LIBS, OXF_LIBS use slash /. So please use also / for LIBS. I recommend this harmonization for consistency reasons, even if both work with MINGW.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Integrations and APIs 2 Functionality already exists

Template Issues in Rhapsody in C++

When using RiC++ it is possible to create directed associations to instances of templates. When the equivalent link is created between the respective objects the directed association is not recognised. It is possible to create a new association in...
almost 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Save button on Rhapsody license not available popup

When losing the connection to the license server, users encounter the Rhapsody dialog box warning that no license if available... stating Rhapsody will be closed when the "OK" button is selected. In the text, it does say that the user may save the...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Information on properties of a model element is different in RMM when compared to RDM

In RMM web we are not seeing any properties information (There is only basic info which is not sufficient). In RDM, we had full details as shown below in the RDM Screenshot. Full Properties details in RMM is very much mandatory for PS-XS as withou...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 2 Future consideration

Add default docking support option for "Display options dialog"

Current behavior of "Display option dialog":Rhapsody does not provides an option to have a single "Display options dialog" to switch between diagram elements.For every diagram element the "Display options dialog" has to be opened again. Proposal :...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 2 Future consideration

Enhance Rhapsody to be able to add execution occurrence on a Lifeline in a sequence Diagram

If you have a sequence diagram and on a lifeline, you have an Execution occurrence. Within that execution occurrence, you can create a message to the self-object. However, if you right-click on this message and from the context menu if you choose ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Rhapsody should not introduce metadata differences when working with multiple editions as this introduces unexpected changes.

When a pool of users work on the same model but use different editions (Developer vs Designer, for example), there is a difference in how types are attributed in the repository. For example, Designer will claim that anything of type Int is from th...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Future consideration

Request to add "Initializer" option in the "Applicable to" list in the Features for Tag at present.

There is no "Initializer" option provided in the "Applicable to" list in the Features for Tag at present.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

Enhancement request to have better document for Rhapsody AND VxWorks integrationn

For Rhapsody and Vxworks inntegration we have only the following document . https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/rhapsody/9.0.1?topic=eclipse-vxworks-workbench This is not a clear document if customer wants to integrate Vxworks with Rhapsody. Could we have...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Rhapsody Client 1 Future consideration

Support relative (from profile) addressing of "customize_menu.xml"

Rhapsody currently does not allow us to distribute "_customize_menu.xml" with an own profile:- typically profile elements (e.g. prp file) can be addressed with a relative path from the profile sbsx.- however the customize_menu.xml requires an abso...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.