IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 928

Need a tool or feature to fix type system inconsistencies

LQE RB Reports don't resolve when RDF URI Conflicts exist within ELM Properties. During Report Creation Time, conflicts appear on the screen for report builders. These conflicts should never be allowed to coexist in the same ELM instance. No provi...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 1 Future consideration

Cross-component ReqIF

DOORS Next can export a component with its internal links to a ReqIF file. But it can't export two DOORS Next, and more importantly : the links between these two components. This enhancement could allow users to use ReqIF to export DOORS documents...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Provide a feature about an option to change default behavior of embedded resources as minimizing / maximizing in each artifacts in a module

Provide a feature about an option to change default behavior of embedded/wrapped resources for minimizing / maximizing in each artifacts in a module. Embedded/wrapped resources are displayed as maximized when opening a module.It takes a lot of tim...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Filter for attributes in the compare / delivery view

When you compare two streams/baselines/change sets etc you get the view where we can see all changes. This view is completely useless in reality and no one uses it, because all changes in all modules will be shown in one huge list together. we nor...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Add "Artifact type" Attribute to "Dominant Source Attribute" List while delivering changes to child stream

Add "Artifact type" Attribute to "Dominant Source Attribute" List while delivering changes to child stream: When using the dominant source attribute update method to update a child stream, the artefact type is not updated if there is a conflict. t...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Primary text functionality and mapping is not clear

Primary Text functionality and mapping needs to be clear. Currently for Requirements artifact, we use "Title" for "Requirement Name", and "Description" for "Requirement Description". So the use of "Primary Text" is not clear. To make the situation...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Reports take a long time

For a review packet. Reports take a long time. Takes 20 min. Last day of sprint it is a long time to wait, especially if multiple modules at 20 min each it adds up.
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Performance 2 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.