IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 877

ReqIf import: No hidden, non-alterable mapping tables which can mess up a project area

Overview, use case: We want to exchange requirements with a customer who uses DOORS Next, too. We have already set up a project area with the same requirements i.e. same artifacts and same attributes as our customer. Our customer modifies some of ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Possibility to group the added artifacts and assign to different reviewers

Currently, it is not possible to group the added artifacts and assign to different reviewers.In DNG review, we can add artifacts and participants. There is no way to group the added artifacts and assign subset of the added artifacts to different r...
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Automatic email notification to the reviewers on nearing the "due date"

This will help the reviewer to complete the review on time.
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Review managing and administration

When we conduct a review, for example a collection of requirements relating to performance, in person during a meeting, in the presence of performance specialists, the participants in this review are either reviewer or validator.To secure this rev...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

The Views REST API schema should provide the name of the view

When running a views query, such as: https://localhost:9443/rm/publish/views?moduleURI=MD_C5RPsDCaEe6U3JRBauIIQg&viewURI=VW_z2cogA1KEe-HB6PRUNr6hQ&projectURI=_e8cRECGoEe6W8LVdNRSkvA The return data include information about the module but ...
about 1 month ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

Allow selecting all dependencies to be ignored

Current behavior: When a user accepts a Change Set from other stream, a list of dependent CS is provided. The user can select which CS to ignore, one by one. This action is very time consuming, if there are many dependencies and the user wants to ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide feedback while exporting or import CSV-file from within a view menu

Exporting or import CSV file from within a view menu does not provide 'feedback of progress' or an indication that the job is still active. Users are advising that they cannot figure if the job has completed or just failed. The issue is causing fr...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Test Script Requirement trace link not sync to requirement trace link in RQM of Test Case retroactively

Test Script Requirement trace link not sync to requirement trace link in RQM of Test Case should have an option to link current data vs future change once configuration is updated
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

Automatically link embedded artifacts to be able to find where embedded artifacts are used

When embedding images (or artifacts in general) in other artifacts, the artifact that embeds the image knows about the embedded artifact and you can e.g. open this artifact. The embedded artifact is just located anywhere and does not know anything...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Better, more consistent, understandable name for filter "Limit by lifecycle status"

The filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" is very unfortunate. The naming style is totally inconsistent with all the other filter names such as "Artifact type", "Modified by" or "<some_attribute_name>". All these other filter names describ...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.