IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 928

Ability to Resolve open comments for Review process which is set to Finalized state

Team, As of ver606, there is no way to resolve open comments for the review status which is set to Finalized state. When you try to resolve it gives an error message which is annoying but it is expected system behavior. I urge development team to ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Link Diagram should show GC Header

As a User of Link Explorer, I need to see the configuration context (local/global) that I am working in, e.g. by retaining the header with config context banner menu
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Not under consideration

Copying Roles and Permissions configuration from one Project Area to another Project Area

In many cases we require new project areas to have the same roles and permissions configurations as per existing project area. The ability to copy across roles and permissions configurations across from an existing project area to another project ...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Need a manual merge capability during delivery for string type custom attributes

We're using DNG to manage our requirements, and we're using both the configuration and change management features. We have changes being made concurrently in multiple streams and multiple change sets, and we need to be able to combine the changes ...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

DNG custom attributes do not appear in report builder until artifacts are created

When you create a new custom attribute to a work item type in RTC, it will immediately become available in the "Set conditions" section under "CHOOSE DATA" in report builder. You don't have to create a work item. You don't even have to add it to a...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

DNG should list the active change set in text on the header just below the current configuration

In order to reduce confusion and users making changes in the wrong change set when they have multiple change sets open, it would be nice if DNG showed in smaller text under the current configuration (when in a GC personal stream), the active chang...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

Allowed Artifacts Types in Module Type need to be constrainable

Allowed Artifacts Types in Module Type need to be constrainable.Currently this is not the case, defining preferred artifact types is not sufficient. Undefined Combinations like adding a Stakeholder Request to an internal requirement are possible.
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

Link Validity shall be part of Component Template

With Config Management enabled, Link Validity are not part of Component Template.This means whenever I create a new DNG component and import a component configuration, Link Validity need to be redefined in the newly created component.Request: Link...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

Adding the artifact IDs in the message is a good idea and would help the users to find which artifacts are exceeding this limit.

Hello together, exporting some DOORS Next views to Excel causes an error message telling "The content of primary test field for some artifacts cannot be exported because it is greater that 32KB." Due to the fact that one Excel cell has a limit of ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Ability to control requirement volatility

In DOORS Classic, when defining attributes I could specify whether or not a change to that attribute would update the Modified On system attribute. Unfortunately in DOORS Next Generation does not have any such option while creating attribute defin...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.