This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Envizi advertises that we leverage emissions factors from IEA and customers purchase Envizi expecting that the product will manage all factors available. There are factors within IEA that Envizi does not leverage and customers do not understand why product does not leverage some factors while leveraging others. Product strategy comes from best practices around emissions accounting, however customers and their auditors are unaware of what these strategies are and why we take these positions. Our Knowledge base makes it clear that Envizi has IEA, but not which factors are not included in the tool.
There might be other factor sets for which similar concerns could arise.
UPDATE:
Canadian Customers Celestica, Bank of Nova Scotia and Bird Construction wonder why we do not leverage emissions factors from the Canadian National Inventory.
Idea priority | High |
Needed By | Quarter |
IBM Wide Managed Tags: Ideas | Market: Americas - Industry, Market: Americas - Canada, Blocker to Deploy |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
Closing unless we get some additional detail. Please comment if it needs to be re-opened.
Hi @Guest & @Guest - can you clarify what this request actually refers to? Are we only talking about electricity? Are we talking about Canada or the United States?
We have a clear approach for Canadian electricity data which is to use the Canadian NIR provincial/territory factors which include an indirect/WTT component in the NIR publication.
If a client doesn't want to use the Canadian NIR factors then it is possible to use the IEA country level electricity factors which also include an indirect/WTT component. IEA is ONLY relevant for electricity information.
With regards to the US EPA guidance around WTT factors for electricity, we will not support obsolete 2017 Defra factors (using an approach relying on 8 year old values seems like horrible guidance). If a US client want to follow strict US EPA guidance for activity B in Canada, then they should not use the Canadian NIR factors and go straight to IEA factors (although the GHG protocol would disagree with this approach as they advise organizations should use the most granular factors available).
Right now overriding the Canadian NIR factor for IEA would require inserting the Default factor set in either slot 1 o 2. We will be adding additional factor set slots in Q1 which will allow for more granular control of the factor set selection (and we will create a dedicated IEA factor set at that time).