This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
This is the same challenge of shifting our automation away from a simple "be cluster-admin" to a RBAC aware model; it's not simple, and it's not going to be quick. However, what we are seeing is that the customers that are interested in this wouldn't be using our ansible/CLI anyway and are looking either at the gitops solution we delivered this year, or like yourselves are looking to build their own. If there's a desire within Ford to use the MAS CLI to perform an install if it could be made RBAC aware then that would help add priority behind such work, but as with other customers, where we are seeing this kind of feedback we are also seeing a desire not to use the CLI in the first place, so at present there is questionable value in making changes in the CLI to support role-aware install/update/upgrade, which is why - so far - we are really only looking to address concerns in this area in terms of providing clear documentation about the roles involved.
FWIW, if you are interested in the progress of this effort, the work in progress RBAC definition can be tracked here: https://github.com/ibm-mas/cli/tree/master/rbac/install