This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
For "box" elements like classes/blocks/activities... there are many options available with grid lines, spacing tools, alignment... but when it comes to connector there is still a lot of manual work necessary to make a diagram "visually appealing".'
One source of this "uncleanliness" is that connectors connect to "boxes" at arbitrary locations - and cannot be easily aligned.
As example see the attached "ConnectorAlignmentX" screen shorts - depending on context the goal of the user is to have elements either explicitly connect at the same place - or explicitly connect at different places. Both cases require tedious "pixel-by-pixel" manipulation - and even then the result looks "unclean".
Proposed is to add "connector points" to the model elements - see the example of how it is done in the Web based graph editor gliffy (https://www.gliffy.com/) - attachment Rhp_SnapHandles.png .
There all UML shapes have typically 3 "magnetic" connector points at the each side that capture incoming connections.
(you can connect elsewhere if you really want to).
This allows to easily connect different model elements at a consistent location.
In addition in gliffy there is a central connector point with the semantic "use any and let the layout algorithm decide). This is also a very elegant way to let the user decide if he wants a fixed or flexible connection.
These connector points would be needed for all "non-line" diagram elements. For custom icons (like images) creating them automatically on the boundary box would be sufficient.
The number of them depends a bit on the shape - I would guess 4x3 for most elements and 4x1 for simple elements like condition connector, history, ... would suffice.
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
This RFE will be considered under the larger project of the Rhapsody GUI and Diagram editors modernization program.
To clarify: We want this for all types of relationships between model elements - (dependencies, aggregations, ...) not only the "connector" model element.
Attachment (Description)
Attachment (Description)
Attachment (Description)
Attachment (Description)