Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Code and Execution

Showing 30

Enhancement request to ncorporate class enumeration in code generation.

The usage of literal name used in enum can not be directly used as a any variable name is prohibited by Standard CPP. Hence there is error "does not name a type", and the subsequent errors like " expected ')' before '*' token". To avoid such issue...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Framework: identifier 'concept' is a keyword in C++20 [-Wc++20-compat]

4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Include Comments with Class Method Parameters

Some code styles include comments for each parameter for a C++ class method. Currently, Rational Rhapsody, when reverse engineering the header, does not connect the comment with the parameter. This creates the unintended result, when we forward ge...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 2 Under review

Enhancement request to show the code pattern in Rhapsody browser .

I have an operation which signature as operation signature is modelled as void MechGeo_MotorStatusReceivedNotification( const AcsLib_ActuatorSysMotorIdType SourceActuatorSysMotorId, const AcsLib_MotorStatusMessageType * const MotorStatusMessagePtr...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 4 Future consideration

Cygwin/MinGW/Linux: ar command with outdated arguments

Currently related Makfile use ARFLAGS=-rvu. But the 'u' modifier requires timestamps, which may be disabled during compile time of ar() with 'D' argument. In this case ar issues a related warning : ar: `u' modifier ignored since `D' is the default...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

Include Reverse Engineering (Populate Flowcharts) into the 64-bit version

Currently the reverse engineering is only available within the 32-bit version. But Rhapsody 10 is only available as a 64-bit version. That would mean that the reverse engineering option and especially the function "populate flowchart" is not avail...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 3 Functionality already exists

Allow further keywords within the property C_CG::Operation::PublicName

There is the property C_CG::Operation::PublicName. By default it is $objectName_$opName. Currently only the classname can be used for the code generation. We have some abbreviations for a class and are thinking to define it in a tagged value. So w...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Functionality already exists

C++11/C++14 "variadic templates" support in Rhapsody's reverse engineering

Hi, We know that currently, Rhapsody‘s reverse engineering does not support C++11 and C++14 (or at least does not support all the C++11/C++14 features) and that it is planned for the next release to update Rhapsody’s features related to C++11/C++1...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 2 Future consideration

Rhp 9.0 -> Panel diagram::Widget explicit code execution

Having a container (C++17 map) with attributes, the attributes should have been displayed on the panel diagram, currently the attribute as it is, it's not modifiable nor displayable by the panel diagram widgets.A C++ method should have be called w...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration

A feature to generate codes from parametric diagram, constraint block, property and spec

Please add a feature to generate codes from parametric diagram, constraint block, property and spec.Currently Rhapsody does not have such feature.Therefore, A user have to implement codes related to constraints by himself and that is time consuming.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Code and Execution 1 Future consideration