Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Clear

DXL

Showing 15 of 7163

Expand DXL to allow creation and management of ReqIF Definitions in DOORS projects.

Currently DXL can control ReqIF operations, but not their most crucial component: definitions. This stops automation in essence, as ReqIF definitions still need to be manually created in the GUI.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

Add 'struct' directives/statement to the DXL interpreter to useful structuring the data/source code

The struct-directive is useful to easily struct and use data in the DXL code for complex scripts Example as in 'C': struct my_struct { int i, string s}; struct my_struct my;my.i = 42;my.s = "Dirk"; print "my.i=" my.i ", my.s=" my.s "\n"; And to be...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

DOORS DXL: Document eval_() as part of the DXL manual and describe it in detail

Currently eval_() has last been documented in a 9.early version (most current) of the API manual for DOORS 9. It is a widely used mechanism for launching DXL inside DXL while using DXL to potentially manipulate the DXL code passed to eval_ based o...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

DOORS DXL: Add support for single line comments ("// some comment <EOL>") in DXL string to eval_(), similar to how checkDXL() behaves

Currently eval_() cannot handle single line comments ("// some comment <EOL>") in its input string parameter, as it prematurely escapes string. This limitation is not documented, and therefore not clear to users. This limitation contradicts ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

ERM DOORS DXL security shall allow more options

An enhanced feature to have separate check boxes for each of the component as below instead of having all under "Enable DXL Restrictions " "Enable DXL Restrictions for DXL Home Path" "Enable DXL Restrictions for BAtch Script " "Enable DXL Restrict...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

ERM DOORS DXL security shall be more granular and allow super DXL users and standard DXL users

Currently the DXL security tab only specifies "Only users with Edit DXL power may edit and run DXL". This shall be more granular and allow different levels of DXL users For example: Level 1 DXL users are allowed to generate/modify attribute DXL/la...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

Add the ability to run multiple DXL Service scripts in parallel for functionality that mimics 'server side DXL'.

Unlike most client/server applications, DOORS 9 has most of the logic on the client side, and little to no automation / scripting / maintenance features on the server side. DOORS DXL Services use DOORS Web Access to offer an interface to DOORS via...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

Link Module Attribute with Dialog Box Element

Dear Sirs, every time that I have to create a custom GUI (by means of DXL) to update attributes it is quite painful. Below is report a classical example how I handle the synch between the attribute and the dialog box element: Module mod = current ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 0 Future consideration

Update the DOORS DXL editor with an IDE and a debugger

Currently the DXL Editor consists of two plain text elements: an input box and an output box. They are poorly suited for either task: entering DXL and displaying DXL output. An editor resembling a basic IDE and a form of debugger to step through s...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 1 Future consideration

Ship unencrypted DXL with DOORS client, so that users can maintain and expand customisations as standard features and their DXL change between versions / fixpacks

Customisations are a major unique feature of DOORS 9 compared to all other tools in the engineering space. They frequently integrate with standard / shipped features / UI elements, and in recent years these standard elements are being encrypted by...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS/DOORS Web Access / DXL 1 Future consideration