Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My votes: Usability

Showing 262 of 5656

RDNG - Possibility of creating link in process diagram

In a process diagram, it is not possible to include links directly to the object in a diagram, they are restricted run by the Links side menu. The user asks if it is possible to enable the use of links directly on diagrams and flows, as it worked ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Cloning with GC conflict errors regarding conflicts is not helpful

When trying to clone a module between components and the GC is involved at the end of the cloning process if a conflict is found (due to overlapping artifacts) the error message is not informative; also when it provide some information about GC it...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

No restriction of characters on filtering on string attributes of custom attributes in DOORS Next

Current situation: When using a full text filter or a string attribute filter in modules, then the filter will only take into account the first 512 characters of the string attribute. This behaviour is only true for custom attributes, not for the ...
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 5 Future consideration

DNG reviews Rest API namespace - needs to include artifact comment creation date and parent/child relationship

When generating a report the comments are in the wrong order (that is also the case with the provided review report). We cannot use the provided date, because that is the latest modified date and not the creation date. That cause, in some cases, t...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Hard to audit changeset after delivery

Difficult to audit a changeset after delivery.Harder after delivery when trying to go back to see what changed. How to diff?No compare with stream option. Instead need to piece meal the changes together. Piece together starting and ending state of...
6 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration