IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 279

Delivery behavior for change set after changes by multiple users

Use case:Working in parallel with multiple users in one change set.For delivery the last change will always set to the user who delivered the change set.So in audit history it is not always clear who did the change because the time of delivery is ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Bulk edit for DN comments

Current behavior: comment for every single artifact has to be modified separately Requested change: introduce the possibility to bulk edit DN comments Change reason: increase RE efficiency
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Remove "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" from users view

The link types "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" seem to be related to an old integration between the RM application and UNICOM Focal Point, as far as I understood from the support. They cannot be edited and used for othe...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Unique handling of links in filter 'Link changes' during delivery and comparison

This is related to TS016372244 and TS016488144. Feedback from IBM Development Team, and it is working as designed: "As we know, when a user creates an incoming link in Component A from Component B, that link is stored in Component B. In my tests, ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG - Possibility of creating link in process diagram

In a process diagram, it is not possible to include links directly to the object in a diagram, they are restricted run by the Links side menu. The user asks if it is possible to enable the use of links directly on diagrams and flows, as it worked ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Update the Where Used for better review location

This request is for enhanced functionality for the Where Used property of artifacts, as shown in the right-hand panel. Since reviews can include both artifacts and modules, our users have difficulty keeping track of the various reviews that have t...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Display (Archived) for users in DNG

In some portion of the tool, the word (Archived) is appended to the end of an archived users name, making it very clear to the user that the person is no longer part of the project. We'd like to see this displayed everywhere that a username occurs...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Allow cloning even with conflicts

Currently the cloning feature is not useful as is; what is needed is he ability to clone without the many conflicts blocking progress and making the use of the feature not feasible.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG reviews Rest API namespace - needs to include artifact comment creation date and parent/child relationship

When generating a report the comments are in the wrong order (that is also the case with the provided review report). We cannot use the provided date, because that is the latest modified date and not the creation date. That cause, in some cases, t...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG review: Artefact IDs are not shown in comments table in review report.

The current DNG review report has two tables:1. The mapping of artefact names to artefact IDs.2. The comment table. (2) uses the artefact name from (1) as the identification for the comments. This should be changed to the artefact ID. Rational: Wh...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.