IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 262

Moving of Requirements between Modules by maintaining the Links is not possible

The Links between Requirement (e.g. Derives To) are stored in the context of the containing Module.Unfortunately it is not possible to move a Requirement from one module to another by maintaining the links.You can only use the same Requirement (sa...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

DNG review: Artefact IDs are not shown in comments table in review report.

The current DNG review report has two tables:1. The mapping of artefact names to artefact IDs.2. The comment table. (2) uses the artefact name from (1) as the identification for the comments. This should be changed to the artefact ID. Rational: Wh...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

DNG - Improve Data Exchange of tables using CSV/Excel files

we are facing an issue with exporting Data form DNG in CSV/Excel files, we are not able to export data containing tables that were inserted in DNG as RTF format from our Customer Specs.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Hard to audit changeset after delivery

Difficult to audit a changeset after delivery.Harder after delivery when trying to go back to see what changed. How to diff?No compare with stream option. Instead need to piece meal the changes together. Piece together starting and ending state of...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Allows creating wrong artifact types

Allows creation of artifacts with wrong types leads to issues.ReqIF has problems, Reports have problems due to this. Need enforcement of artifact type so, for example, non-modules can't be modules. Allowed to create and then edit an artifact to an...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.