Skip to Main Content
IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 282

DNG review: Artefact IDs are not shown in comments table in review report.

The current DNG review report has two tables:1. The mapping of artefact names to artefact IDs.2. The comment table. (2) uses the artefact name from (1) as the identification for the comments. This should be changed to the artefact ID. Rational: Wh...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Delivery behavior for change set after changes by multiple users

Use case:Working in parallel with multiple users in one change set.For delivery the last change will always set to the user who delivered the change set.So in audit history it is not always clear who did the change because the time of delivery is ...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Remove "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" from users view

The link types "Elaborates / Elaborated By" and "Specifies / Specified By" seem to be related to an old integration between the RM application and UNICOM Focal Point, as far as I understood from the support. They cannot be edited and used for othe...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Unique handling of links in filter 'Link changes' during delivery and comparison

This is related to TS016372244 and TS016488144. Feedback from IBM Development Team, and it is working as designed: "As we know, when a user creates an incoming link in Component A from Component B, that link is stored in Component B. In my tests, ...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

GC link enhancement for compare configuration GUI

When linking between artifacts in different components using a global configuration, the compare configuration GUI currently says "The target of the link is not in the configuration". However, as of version 7.0.2 some of the behavior around links ...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

DNG multiselection shall be kept after a modification

When selecting multiple artifacts and doing a bulk change the selection is unselected after the change is done. So for doing another bulk change all the requirements have to be selected again.Please change so that multiselection is kept after one ...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Searching / Filtering for Artifact Comment information

The comments field for artifacts is used to document any comments, discussions, review comments for an artifact. This is shown in the corresponding Comment when the artefact is selected.However it´s best practice in requirements engineering that i...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Cloning with GC conflict errors regarding conflicts is not helpful

When trying to clone a module between components and the GC is involved at the end of the cloning process if a conflict is found (due to overlapping artifacts) the error message is not informative; also when it provide some information about GC it...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG - Improve Data Exchange of tables using CSV/Excel files

we are facing an issue with exporting Data form DNG in CSV/Excel files, we are not able to export data containing tables that were inserted in DNG as RTF format from our Customer Specs.
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Make reports available as filters

It's usefull since we are using reports to check for open or inconsitent requiremements. It would be helpfull to work directly on the affected requirements in DNG
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration