IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 272

DN - filter for "limit lifecycle status" can not be applied in linked artifacts

When applying a filter for linked artifacts I am not able to add another filter for existing OSLC links like "limit lifecycle status". This will be mandatory to be able to use e.g. the connection to workflow items for release assignment. Use case:...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Display Embedded Artifacts in "Where Used"

In "Where Used" you can see if an artifact is used in Modules, included in reviews, etc. - but not if it is embedded in anther artifact! This means it can be included in sveral modules - and that is not displayed. This makes impact analysis go wrong.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Enable Filtering in Views from Attributes of Linked Artifacts

We would like to be able to filter a view in the UI based on a value (or portion) of a linked artifact. Sorting would also be nice. The importance of this is that it's apparently possible in DOORS 9.6 & we keep getting bludgeoned by DOORS fans...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Add capability to customize ‘default' comment targets within review and non-review.

This request is to add the ability to customize who is the default recipient on an artifact comment. There are a few ways this could be implemented, such as a default field on all artifacts that defines who comments are sent to (including a field ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

in-app reviews require opening 5 to 10 tabs to complete

How to get just what you changed for review and shows links for that. Prefer to do inside the tool, but difficult.Not being able to conduct reviews in the tool and the difficulty of exporting a change set to a document to facilitate review outside...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

No multi-component-set view

The inadequacy of the change set views and exports when it comes to links to/from other components. i.e. not having a “multi-component-change-set” sort of view.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Create Report Doesn't have all the information required to do the review

On Compare ConfigurationsMissing text/attributes. Not enough context to review the changes. Will also fail on modules with broken links.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Multiple changesets mixed in diff

History view does not separate change sets so the changes can be interleaved, thus making it hard to see just the changes for a particular change set.
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Hard to audit changeset after delivery

Difficult to audit a changeset after delivery.Harder after delivery when trying to go back to see what changed. How to diff?No compare with stream option. Instead need to piece meal the changes together. Piece together starting and ending state of...
9 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.