IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 270

Use same name for attribute everywhere

In some cases for system attributes in DNG, the attribute names are displayed differently, e.g. in the item detailed view as "Format" and in the column header as "Artifact Format".Request: Display all system attributes in the same way in the GUI e...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Apply the Module Content folder setting in project properties to ReqIF imports

This setting applies to modules created in DOORS Next, but misses out on the scenario of ReqIF imported modules, which are placed by default in the project root. It is not clear to customers that this setting does not apply to ReqIF imports and so...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DOORS NG shall have an option to restore the deleted data

DOORS NG shall have an option to restore/undelete the deleted data for the requirements authors/composers.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

RDNG : Permanently purge the archived streams

RDNG : Permanently purge the archived streams
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

"Modified On" and "Modified by" value for modules reflecting also changes on artefacts inside this module

At the moment each artefact has a timestamp when it was last modified (value "Modified on") which is subject to actualisation when something was changed on or in the artefact. With modules however this value only changes when the module itself was...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG comments are filled with default "Directed To"

In RDNG projects, the default comment attribute is filled with some default user ids. We wanted to remove those so the section are not pre-filled. Please help us a way to have the Directed to field as blank in RDNG comments.
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

Compare and work of/with changes is bad

After a re-import i tried to find out which changes occur. I looked for this in the change set and start to deliver - after clicking step by step i come to the overview that i can see the dedicated occured changes --> 532changes.The issue here ...
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 3 Not under consideration

No Revisions shown in Baseline History

When working in the context of a baseline, the module history shows no revisions, not even the ones older than the current baseline.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Missing Feature: Select all Artifacts on Page

Missing Feature: Select all Artifacts seen on PageCurrently, you have to select 1st artifact, scroll down, then shift select last artifact.Basix usability issue.
over 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

keep focus on selected artifact in module view when switching between configurations or creating change sets

Currently, the focus inside the module view is loost when a change set is created or discarded and the top of the module is displayed. This causes users to search again for the selected artifact they have been working on, leading to inefficiency a...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.