IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 239

Link to Reviews: Links to reviews are shown independent of the current GC context from artifact point of view.

For a give module/artifact all reviews links are shown independent of the context the review were created in (see attachments). Request: constrain the link list to reviews, which were created in the current context, only.
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Add "removed from source" information to overview of changes in comparison

When comparing 2 streams, artifacts that were removed from a module (not finally deleted) are not shown in that written form (on the table on the left - see "table" and table_2"). This removal is visible: only "visually" in compare window from DNX...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG - Possibility of creating link in process diagram

In a process diagram, it is not possible to include links directly to the object in a diagram, they are restricted run by the Links side menu. The user asks if it is possible to enable the use of links directly on diagrams and flows, as it worked ...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type in module view

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type (numbered row, normal row) in module view.Use Case: Since the normal multiedit is restricted to 200 artifacts (and we often have that case, for example after migration of documents bulk adaptations are ...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

DOORS Next generation comments have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired us

DOORS Next generation resolved comments in artifacts have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired users. IBM is working on how to best represent this information in an accessible way but meanwhile the...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Module Pencil Menue "Set as heading or Content" shall modify artifact type and format according to artifact type definition

Today one can use the comand to change headings into text or requirements. It is a nice way to work, but it is impossible to change an artifact into a diagram, becase the format is not changed. If a user tries to do this, they will create miss-mat...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

create view by user (instead of by role)

Possibility to create view for user in contrast by role and instead of each user create theirs personal views.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Module Audit History filter functionality

Objective to know in what module a base requirement was used before removed from a module. Nowadays you need to check Module Audit History and look for module structure change to see if a specific artifact has been removed. But it is very difficul...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Create View from a Baseline in ERM

In Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next, we need the ability to create a View from within a Module of a Baseline. Please unlock personal view creation and modification in baseline/snapshots
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

Provide automation for managing configuration pruning in ELM

The number of Configfurations can grow quite large in an ELM environment and managing them i.e. archiving/pruning them using the manual archiving process under the Manage Components and Configurations menu is impractical and time consuming for Users.
almost 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.