IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 142

When comparing configurations in DOORS Next provide a way for the user to specifiy attributes to ignore. Also need an option to ignore white space.

It will be very helpful to be able to ignore attribures such as Last Modified and Status as well as ignoring white space differences.
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to manage and report on the Team Ownership data for a set of requirements in a Requirement Repository Project

Problem Statement: There is not a way to report, sort, or filter on a set of requirements by Team Ownership, in order to facilitate the updating of the Team Ownership data to control the access. Request: Provide an ability to manage Team Ownership...
2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

in modules prevent base artifact linking via project admin setting

In the system engineering all customers working in DNG with in the module mode. The default requirement engineer works inside a module and is not aware of the background settings in DNG, eg the artifacts are stored in a module folder and there is ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Future consideration

Undo Function

An Undo Function similar to CTRL-Z in Office Applications is requested. Missing undo functionality for recent edit steps, especially for unintentional changes by “clicking and typing somewhere” in the req. definition or in another attribute in com...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow selecting all dependencies to be ignored

Current behavior: When a user accepts a Change Set from other stream, a list of dependent CS is provided. The user can select which CS to ignore, one by one. This action is very time consuming, if there are many dependencies and the user wants to ...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide feedback while exporting or import CSV-file from within a view menu

Exporting or import CSV file from within a view menu does not provide 'feedback of progress' or an indication that the job is still active. Users are advising that they cannot figure if the job has completed or just failed. The issue is causing fr...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Better, more consistent, understandable name for filter "Limit by lifecycle status"

The filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" is very unfortunate. The naming style is totally inconsistent with all the other filter names such as "Artifact type", "Modified by" or "<some_attribute_name>". All these other filter names describ...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

links are not following the data model after change of artifact type

Observed behavior: I figured out that there is a link “Derived from” from a Requirement in one PA to an Information in another PA, which is not supported by the data model. (limited by a defined Linked Constraint) Steps to reproduce: Initially, th...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DN IBM feature request - improve usability of audit history

Current behavior: audit history in DN provides a detailed view and a huge amount of data, looking for the relevant information is difficult Requested change: improve analysis of history data, enable filtering for history data, like string search ,...
3 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Remind users if a Change Set (CS) is older than one week and not delivered yet

Current behavior: Currently a lot of change sets are created by users but forgotten that they are open or not found any more, since it's not known how to find them.Finally we have a lot of old CS also containing changes no one knows if they are st...
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.