This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
The filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" is very unfortunate.
The naming style is totally inconsistent with all the other filter names such as "Artifact type", "Modified by" or "<some_attribute_name>". All these other filter names describe the filter target data, with only nouns in them.
In contrast to those, filter name "Limit by lifecycle status" describes an action which this filter will achieve, with a verb in it. This does not fit to all the other filter names. The fact that applying them will "limit" the view is implicitly given, as they are filters. No need to mention that explicitly in its name.
If you would name all other filters consistently, you would have to name them e.g. "Limit by artifact type" (instead of "Artifact type"), "Limit by modified by date" (instead of "Modified by"), "Limit by Attribute_ABC" (instead of "Attribute_ABC") which would by rather ugly. Good that this is not the case. But: That one filter name "Limit by modified by date" still is ugly, and not consistent to all others.
Therefore: Could this be renamed, please? Some suggestions for better names:
"Linked lifecycle status"
or just "Linked status"
or I am open for other suggestions :-)
Idea priority | Medium |
Needed By | Yesterday (Let's go already!) |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.