IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 228

RFE-166302: UAT Finding: Test Plan reconciliation not able to handle testcase removal

The "reconcile" function via which "requirement" artifacts are used to trigger testcase artifact creation on ETM side and/or addition of testcases into ETM Test Plans is unable to efficiently deal with the situation that requirements "no longer" r...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

ELM702: Test Plan reconciliation not able to handle testcase removal

At the beginning requirements (in ERM) are set for a specific VnV Method (and VnV Method Sub). Based on this initial setting Test Plan(s) are created in ETM and testcase reconciliation is done. But then afterwards (e.g. due to further requiremen...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG : Tag modification is not always reported in the Compare and Deliver dialogs

The goal of this RFE is to improve the behaviour below so that the users know in the Compare dialog in the GUI, what was modified, but are still the same in both streams To reproduce: -create a CM enabled project -create a Requirement -add a Pers...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Export 'Review' columns to Excel

Business Need: After creating a review in DNG and adding artifacts to that review, the user is able to see what reviews are linked to the artifacts by adding 'Review' column to the artifact view. However, when they export this view to a spreadshee...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG OSLC configuration selection UI should support selection of opt-out baselines

If the project is opt-out, we cannot use the OSLC configuration picker to select the baseline as the opt-out project areas are not listed. Use case: Reporting on opt-out baseline Currently, we have to manually set the "Configuration-Context" for t...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

RDNG comments are filled with default "Directed To"

In RDNG projects, the default comment attribute is filled with some default user ids. We wanted to remove those so the section are not pre-filled. Please help us a way to have the Directed to field as blank in RDNG comments.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Save report into a DOORS Next folder if you are working in a Baseline.

There is no possibility to save a Report in a folder in DOORS when I open a Baseline, It should be possible to Save a Report in a folder even if I open a Baseline.
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Advanced ReqIF Import tagging feature should include some way to identify affected modules

Advanced ReqIF import offers a nice feature that tags artifacts that already exist in the modules in the target environment, but that are not present in the incoming modules from the ReqIF package. However, the only way to determine which modules ...
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Attribute Data Types "Date" doesn't provide us with FULL month, it only provides a abbreviation now

we need to a way to display full month to meet our document standard
almost 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Create projects templates for CM enabled Projects which includes all components

At present you can only create a template at a component level however this will not preserve links between components which is a major limitation. We need the ability to create a CM Project template and select components (or just include all acti...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.