IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

Usability

Showing 269

The option to "Change Artifact Type" does not honor Link Restrictions of the new artifact type so there should be a warning to manually update Links after changing the artifact type.

End User Perspective: "DNG should prevent us from changing an artifact to a new type if it has links that violate link restrictions in the new type. I was able to change (a certain) artifact that was driving Req artifacts to (another artifact type...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Import/Export Project Properties ( All types and Attributes)

Export to EXCEL for documentation : We need to export project properties in EXCEL so we can manage , review them for discussion and approval, and integrate them in upstream documentation for the organization to have as references . It is like hav...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Export multiple modules of a component inside RDNG project to Word or PDF

Dear IBM, We are looking for options to export multiple modules of a component to work or PDF.Now we are doing module by module and then merge those documents into single document.This has become a big productivity drainer for users.For example if...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Flexible presentation options for editing custom string attributes in context of module views

Beside filling the primary text our users have additional custom attributes filled with meta data. There are also some text attributes, in some of them longer texts are stored.However, if the user wants to edit this custom text attribute inside th...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

DNG Reviews - Tag users on review comments

Reviewers should be able to mention other valid users who have permission to the reviews, on a comment, to direct specific comment to the user(s). @mentioning people who are part of a Review to direct a specific comment to them
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Add a field in the XML file so it is possible to se if Title is a generated title or not

Building reports for DNG with RPE Make a way to check if an artifact has a real title - or if the text in the title field is generated. I have some requirements writers filling in a title on some requirements - but not on all. Documents look reall...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to show entire "Primary Text" of linked Artifacts in DNG

Currently, when an Artifact is linked to another Artifact from a different module, the Primary Text Display of the linked Artifact is does not show any text after a carriage return or Enumeration. Why is it useful? This is useful during analysis ...
over 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Support Swagger UI for REST API development and testing

https://swagger.io/ Swagger interface makes it extremely efficient to develop, and test REST API - based tasks.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type in module view

Allow multiedit of artifacts to set row type (numbered row, normal row) in module view.Use Case: Since the normal multiedit is restricted to 200 artifacts (and we often have that case, for example after migration of documents bulk adaptations are ...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

DOORS Next generation comments have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired us

DOORS Next generation resolved comments in artifacts have opacity filter below 1 making the reading process very difficult for visually impaired users. IBM is working on how to best represent this information in an accessible way but meanwhile the...
over 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.