IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5966 of 5966

variable assignments in autoscripts should logged at the TRACE level

I believe it is good practice for automation scripts to log approximately 1 message at the INFO level per execution -- just enough to give a support person a clue that the script is running and that it did something. In addition to that, a script ...
about 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) / System Admin Config/Security 4 Future consideration

The Global Binding Value for literal autoscript variables should allow nulls

For automation script variables of Binding Type LITERAL, the Binding Value needs to be permitted to be left blank / null. This will allow developers to make Variables optional and will not require them to craft garbage data, like "N/A", for their ...
about 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) 2 Future consideration

Reporting Attribute-based and Non-Attribute based presentation details from EWM into RPE Template

Reporting Attribute-based and Non-Attribute based presentation details from EWM into RPE Template
about 3 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Usability 8 Not under consideration

Warning box on unchecking the checkbox for creating CCM links

In the option to create links from requirements management to Work Items in change and configuration management, 1. There is an option to create check or uncheck to see the work items in the current global configuration. 2. If checked the work ite...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

RQM does not have a native way to view all the test cases which are pending for review

Steps:Open a Test caseGo to the Formal reviewAdd Approvers Repeat the same with multiple test cases and select different approvers Expected: As a Test manager, i would like to see all the Test cases pending for approval grouped by the approvers. A...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

When we generate the TSER or TCER there is no way to add a prefix. This makes it tough for the users to make sense if its a test Suite or Test Case or TSER or TCER.

It helps the user to get a quick visual feedback. Having it configurable could be even better.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Test Execution 0 Future consideration

Add tab with workflow and state changes

As a user I want to have an overview about all possible state changes of the tickets and the preconditions for this.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

No possibility to provide comments for a specific approval

This possibility is missing. Espercially on rejection of an approval it shall be possible to provide a comment that is related to the approval.
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Usability 1 Future consideration

Enhancement for Linux support of Rhapsody

This is a follow up of TS011966179. Item 1) and 3) should be handled via idea space according to IBM support. In file C:\ProgramData\IBM\Rhapsody\9.0.1\IBM\Rhapsody\9.0.1\Share\LangCpp\Linux\linuxShare.tar are a number of problems. Furthermore, I ...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Installation 1 Future consideration

Enhancement request for proper documentation Model Synchronization profile

Documentation Model Synchronization profile:This is a good feature to have in Rhapsody At present there is only one short documentation in in the below link :https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/hr/SSB2MU_8.4.0/com.ibm.rhp.uml.diagrams.doc/...
almost 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Documentation 1 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.