IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 2865

Enable option to add custom attributes in DNG review section

We would like to add our own attributes to the review section where we have only option to add requirements. Example How can one add to this Review overview a column e.g. “Artefact type” to make the review not that much time consuming. So easily w...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Change "modified date" field when the artifact is delivered, or add a new "delivered date" field

Hello, The main purpose of this idea is to make the oslc query "oslc.where=dcterms:modified>=<<your_date>>^^xsd:datetime" more useful. I think the main usage of this query is to find the artifacts that were modified recently, or the...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Future consideration

Add Associate Inspection Form to the Asset Template to enable these Inspection Forms be carried over to an Asset

Add Associate Inspection Form to the Asset Template to enable these Inspection Forms be carried over to an Asset so that similar Assets records can be created and maintained with same standards. This will allow Organizations to standardize Asset's...
about 3 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) / Asset/Work Management 1 Future consideration

Enhancement request to support Multicast with Proxyport.

Support for multicast with Proxyport.
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Systems Design Rhapsody/RMM / Modeling and UI 2 Future consideration

Test Script Steps to have a unique identifier

Test Script Steps do not have a unique identifier (they only have a step index which changes whenever steps are added/removed in a Test Script). This means that there is no consistency for identifying a specific test script step over time and ther...
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Improve usability by adding "Find & Replace" for any (sub-)string in an attribute of any/all ETM artifacts

There is no function to find and replace a string in ETM. This is a basic user need.
about 2 months ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 0 Future consideration

Show the progress of an ongoing rebase activity

rebase can take up to a day and there is no progress shown, only in active services it is shown as running
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Unassigned 0 Future consideration

Remove inspection forms.

Our clients have many inspection forms that they want to remove but there is not option for that. They can Inactivate them, but it is not enough due the information still displaying in the inspection list and these forms are garbage.
6 months ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) / Asset/Work Management 1 Future consideration

Undo Function

An Undo Function similar to CTRL-Z in Office Applications is requested. Missing undo functionality for recent edit steps, especially for unintentional changes by “clicking and typing somewhere” in the req. definition or in another attribute in com...
about 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Ability to configure Inspection Forms at Site level as well as at Org Level (Similar to Job Plan)

As we are aware that Inspection forms by design are intended to work in an ORG level only. We have a business requirement to be able to configure at Site level as well as Org level, in line with Job Plan functionality.
over 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) / Asset/Work Management 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.