IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 5870 of 5870

Custom status synonym not visible in Asset application

Custom synonyms created for different internal values are not displayed in the Change Status dialog when associated to different sites/organizations in the Asset application. Currently, Maximo does not have the functionality to display the same na...
about 2 years ago in IBM MAS - Manage (Base) 1 Not under consideration

Configurable color scheme for available/unavailable workspaces

Option to configure the color coding to something more intuitive/familiar for the set of users (red/green color coding for unavailable/available workspaces, e.g.) gives flexibility to administrators and to make the experience more intuitive for en...
about 2 years ago in IBM TRIRIGA Building Insights 0 Not under consideration

Modify server.xml file via /jts/setup and via repotools-jts -setup automatically when setting up LDAP

The LDAP configuration process creates the Application.xml and ldapUserRegistry.xml files with the provided values. As part of the configuration, a message is thrown saying that: "To complete the LDAP configuration, comment out <include locatio...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Administration 1 Not under consideration

Provide the ability to see who updated a review participant's status

Many times a review creator has to set a participant to Abstained in order to finalize the Review. The system should track this either in the Review report or in the actual Review. Our current workaround it to enter something in the comments but s...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Implement LDAP setup in repotools-jts -setup same way as in the Web UI

Currently the repotools-jts -setup command does not include the LDAP configuration. Although it is documented in the Interactive Installation Guide, it would be better if the command behaves the same way as the Web UI, creating the Application.xml...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Foundation/Common Services / Administration 1 Not under consideration

Establish a field like the discussion field also for other elements like review comments

The discussion field is used to document user entries with a specific time stamp. This functionality is also helpful for other use cases, e.g. to store review findings or something else. But unfortunately the discussion field can only be used once...
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Work Items 2 Future consideration

Problems during Build Synchronization in RTC Clinet and Jenkins

There are build synchronization inconsistencies Observed in various cases that are confusing to users. Detailed use cases & it's expected results are attached in the file.
about 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Workflow Management / Build 2 Future consideration

Option to show most recent result against a QM linked test case

When trying to understand testing progress against requirements, currently if linking requirements to test case it shows the highest severity test result that exists against that test case as the marker on the requirement in DOORs. This doesn't ma...
about 2 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Need to pin the popup selection of Keywords in the entry of the steps of a test

I submit here a problem of ergonomics found during our use of RQM. In the "Edit Test Scripts Inline" view of a Test Case or in the "Manual Steps" view of a Test Script, it is possible to reference keywords. For this purpose, a button is used to di...
about 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Test Management / Usability 1 Not under consideration

Expose DNG Module's Baseline Information in REST API

DNG Customers in regulated industries need to have a printable version of a baseline module. Who baselined it and when it was baselined, and the baseline are two pieces of information that can be used to identify a baseline version. The ability to...
about 6 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 3 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.