IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

My ideas: IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 962 of 6070

Change "modified date" field when the artifact is delivered, or add a new "delivered date" field

Hello, The main purpose of this idea is to make the oslc query "oslc.where=dcterms:modified>=<<your_date>>^^xsd:datetime" more useful. I think the main usage of this query is to find the artifacts that were modified recently, or the...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Future consideration

Different history documentation in Change Set history and in artifact history

IBM case: TS017493161 According to the artifact history, the artifact A has been changed in the change set delivered. Ex: Verdict is cleared. In the change set history of the delivered change set the modification made is not completely described. ...
4 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

DOORS Next: Configuration of E-Mail Attributes for Comments on Artifacts

Current: At the moment an e-mail of a comment (discussion) looks like this: Subject: [ArtfaktType 123456] Artfiakt-Name-up-to-256-chars-or-advanced-setting-in-doorsnext-hiher-then-256-chars E-Mail: User-Name + again the Artifact-Name \n Comment-su...
11 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Undo Function

An Undo Function similar to CTRL-Z in Office Applications is requested. Missing undo functionality for recent edit steps, especially for unintentional changes by “clicking and typing somewhere” in the req. definition or in another attribute in com...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Evolve link types constraints in DOORS NEXT to configure link types between modules names

In DOORS Classic, for a specific module (named by its name), it is possible to define the authorized links to another module (by its name). Goal: configure link constraints for the users to avoid errors.UseCase in DOORS Classic: right click on a m...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Review managing and administration

When we conduct a review, for example a collection of requirements relating to performance, in person during a meeting, in the presence of performance specialists, the participants in this review are either reviewer or validator.To secure this rev...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Administration 0 Future consideration

DNG review: Work with "module artifacts" instead of "base artifacts" only

In the moment only base artifacts can be added to DNG reviews. Module artifacts cannot be added to reviews. This led to the effect that only base artifact links are shown in the review screen. Module artifact links are not shown.Since we review on...
almost 4 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Allow to send email to user who Locked Artifact from UI directly

If artifact is locked, new user needs to check who locked it and separately compose email to user and ask unlocking. Proposal is to allow sending email directly from "Artifact is locked" massage in UI. Similar function is in Doors Classic 9.0
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Enable Link Labels to be (1) imported, (2) exported, and (3) available to display in a JRS report (see ENGRPT-I-40).

Link Labels are not fully implemented. They exist in the database and can be edited via the DNG web app, but they cannot be (1) imported, (2) exported, or (3) displayed on a JRS report (see ENGRPT-I-40). Consequently, I can only enter/edit the lab...
5 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

Easily identify all entries which are using a certain folder as content folder.

It is currently not possible to see where has a certain folder has been used as content folder. This should be possible to save time and effort.
7 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 0 Future consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.