IBM Sustainability Software - Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against the products and services belonging to IBM Sustainability Software. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

ADD A NEW IDEA

IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next

Showing 928 of 5785

Top level quick view does not always show differences

Not easy to tell what link was removedTrying to map module to component doesn't show and Quick Search fails.Ideally would be similar to the module view where can bring up the detailsLinks do not show in high level view Top level view shows there a...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Quick view does not highlight differences, but detail view does-Hard to quickly see diffs

Have to use multiple views in order to get the true representation of what changed.In high level view, it might be showing the difference, but not highlighted. Have to go to detailed view and in that detailed view it does correctly highlight the d...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Feature 2 Not under consideration

Hard to audit changeset after delivery

Difficult to audit a changeset after delivery.Harder after delivery when trying to go back to see what changed. How to diff?No compare with stream option. Instead need to piece meal the changes together. Piece together starting and ending state of...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Allows creating wrong artifact types

Allows creation of artifacts with wrong types leads to issues.ReqIF has problems, Reports have problems due to this. Need enforcement of artifact type so, for example, non-modules can't be modules. Allowed to create and then edit an artifact to an...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Cannot prevent changes during review period

Somewhat a symptom of not having in-tool review. Cannot prevent changes subsequent to review/approval but prior to delivery of a change set. Change set state is either open or delivered. No "Under review-don't make changes" state. Since have to do...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 1 Future consideration

Can't see just your own differences between changesets

Can't see just your own differences between change sets. Mixed in with everyone's diffs. Very confusing to see just your own diffs and get misleading visualizations so that now have to dive into each to confirm if real changes or not.Difficulty wi...
8 months ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 2 Not under consideration

Primary text functionality and mapping is not clear

Primary Text functionality and mapping needs to be clear. Currently for Requirements artifact, we use "Title" for "Requirement Name", and "Description" for "Requirement Description". So the use of "Primary Text" is not clear. To make the situation...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Provide a REST GET that returns details on streams that are archived.

If a stream is archived and we send a GET https://<server>:9443/rm/cm/stream/_dLNAYC-zEe6JCvbIaN9OcQthen we get an HTTP 404 error. If we undo the archive of the stream then we can GET the details of the stream. We need get the details withou...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Unassigned 5 Not under consideration

DN - filter for "limit lifecycle status" can not be applied in linked artifacts

When applying a filter for linked artifacts I am not able to add another filter for existing OSLC links like "limit lifecycle status". This will be mandatory to be able to use e.g. the connection to workflow items for release assignment. Use case:...
over 1 year ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Usability 0 Future consideration

Icon Glossary for DOORS Next Gen

Icons in DOORS Next Gen are becoming numerous particularly when global configuration is enabled and projects contain multiple components. Many of the newer icons are not accompanied with hovers that indicate the definition of the icon. Documentati...
about 5 years ago in IBM Engineering - Requirements Management DOORS Next / Documentation 3 Not under consideration

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.